| Wayne Booth,the critic of literature in the United States, has advanced an important concept of implied author in the rhetoric of fiction published in 1961, which was called'one of the most successful nomenclature of literature in the 20th century', and considered as'a great contribution to the research of narrative'. The development of the concept during half a century was a process of being attacked, protected, deconstructed, renaissance, improved and redefined, and'few nomenclatures of literature have made narratologists puzzled and captivated like implied author does'. The concept of implied author had used its vigorous elements to promote the research of literature theory, and constantly generated new space for semantics, just like the Aleph written by Borges did.The concept of implied author did not, however, generated without any foundation. In one way, it is the literature situation at that time to drive booth make this choice. The advancing of the concept was considered as a intersection of Chicago school and new critic school, and promoted the compromise of the two competed ones. In another way, more important, the factor is the influence of academic origin and history in deep level which could be pursued from the light of Aristotle's rhetoric in ancient Greece to the influence of Bakhtin's Polyphonic Novel Theory.The concept of people of people advanced by Bakhtin may have direct or indirect influence on Booth. What is people of people? Bakhtin interpreted it as"something holiness", and said the people of people is true Christianity and the man with godhood in the field of orthodoxy anthropology. Bakhtin considered it as the interaction of various consciousness in ideas (may be more than it) and"the people who have the inter-dialogism and the color of debate". Thus we could say that Bakhtin's people of people and Booth's implied author have different ways, but same excellent result. In the perspective of thought, the common ground of Bakhtin and Booth is the focusing on implied character in works: one is the people of people on protagonist; the other is the second author except the real one, the implied author. As Bakhtin indicated in the beginning of Problems of Poetics:"…in the creating thought of artist, the main character in Dostoevsky's work is not only the object the author's discuss intend to represent, but also the subject who expresses himself. Thus, the discuss on protagonist is not limited in normal practical function of portraying character and narrating story, which is needed by the depicting of practical life, and meanwhile, it is not the representation of author's position as Byron for example. Thus, the consciousness of the protagonist is considered as another one, the consciousness of other. But at the same time it is not objectified, not confined in itself, not become the pure object of author's consciousness. In this perspective, the image of the protagonist in Dostoevsky's work is not the same as the objective ones in traditional fiction. To interpreted the implied author, Booth indicated that:"…the implied author (the author's'second self').—Even the novel in which no narrator is dramatized creates an implicit picture of an author who stands behind the scenes, whether as stage manager, as puppeteer, or as an indifferent God, silently paring his fingernails. This implied author is always distinct from the'real man'—whatever we may take him to be—who creates a superior version of himself, a'second self,'as he creates his work.'In the perspective of art expressing technique, the people of people in Bakhtin's polyphonic text, which voice is relatively independent and free, embodies value judgment that the author have on the protagonist, and Booth's implied author is not only the represent of fiction rhetoric technique, but also includes the content of moral and emotion.In the perspective of text construction, Bakhtin's people of people reflects a potential text particularity of the idea of the polyphony in polyphonic fiction and the polymerization in orthodoxy, and it makes the text full of dialogism and openness. The implied author is just like what Booth has indicated:"…our sense of the imlied author includes not only the extractable meanings but also the moral and emotional content of each bit of action and suffering of all of the characters. It includes, in short, the intuitive apprehension of a completed artistic whole; the chief value to which this implied author is committed, regardless of what party his creator belongs to in real life, is that which is expressed by the total form.It could not be seen from above that Booth's concept is directly influenced by Bakhtin, but the two masters'great wisdom and exploring could be felt, and the shadow of influence from Bakhtin to Booth in deep level of thought could be found.The vigorous vitality of implied author promoted a series emergence of new theories during its development, for example Wolfgang Iser's aesthetic reflection theory, which has been affected by Booth directly or indirectly. This could be seen in Bakhtin's interpretation of"the man in mirror":"…the man in mirror is the externalized image of thought, motion and spirit. It is not seeing the world from inner by my eyes, but seeing myself by the eyes of other and the world: I am controlled by others. There is no infantile integrity brought by the combination of the outside and the inside. Peeking the image of myself which is constructed back to back, it is a infantile combination of me and others. I don't have the view point that could see myself from outside, I can't get close to the image of me in my deep heart. It is other's eyes to observe through my eyes."The implied author and the implied reader confirm each other in the interaction of texts and generate fantastic aesthetic effect.As'which expressed by the total form', the space for interpreting opened by the concept of implied author is so extensive, that it has gained new way of interpretation when placing in the Lefebvre's third space theory and Soja's thirding-as-othering concept.Henri Lefebvre, the French socialist, constructed the theory of three dimensions space: first, the space of physics, includes the nature and the universe; second, the space of spirit, includes logic abstract and formal abstract; third, the space of society. Edward W. Soja, an American postmodern political geographer, has indicated that:"the concept of the third space, will have more complex meanings than with which Lefebvre intend to endow the space of society. It is different with the physical space and the spiritual space, or the first and the second space in other words, but contains and exceeds them". Soja believed, the epistemology of the third space"originates from the affirmative deconstruction and the illuminative reconstruction on the dualism of the first space and the second space", which is another example of thirding-as-ot hering. Such thirding is not only for criticizing the thinking mode of the first space and the second space, but also for recovering their thinking instrument of mastering the space knowledge through injecting new possibilities which may not be cognized by traditional space science.The author believes that Lefebvre and Soja's theory of the third space have inspiriting effect on the research of implied author in thinking and methodology..At first, the advancing of thirding-as-othering concept is the representation of new thinking. It has not only changed the situation that people historically surveyed and interpreted in a single dimension, but also broken the boundary of people's closed thought. Facing the radically opened"othering", the thinking should spread the wings, and inspire us to soar freely in the sky of literature.At second, it is the enlightenment in methodology, and have two parts. One is the similarity of thinking logic. The presentation of implied author in texts is similar with the construction of thirding-as-othering. To the implied author, the first space was the real author in real world, who is the material basic of the art texts constructing, and nothing could be discussed without him or her. The second space of the implied author is the created texts which symbolizes the spirit producing. And the third one is the thirding-as-othering image of implied author between the first space and the second one. It is not a simple addition of the two dimensions, but a new art image endowed with many aesthetics meanings—"which expressed by the total form". This image exceeds the other ones in the third space of texts, and presents a three dimension dialectic character of the accumulating in literature space. The other part is the metaphor of texts. The image of Aleph written by Borges let us see the presentation of literature in the third space. From this, it could be see that the thirding-as-othering implied author in literature texts constructs itself which shows an opened space, and brings the extended thinking which has exceeded the first space and the second space. To some degree it is the artistic sublimation of Booth's implied author as well. Just like Holabird said,"a particular paradigm creates the skill of interpretation, and the interpreted object as well."To the implied author, Aleph is not the other, but the practical aesthetic space of texts. Therefore, the last chapter interprets the historical, social and cultural dimension of implied author, and presents the aesthetics effect of the tempo-spatial dimension of it in texts.Booth's concept of implied author has abundant signification and huge space of value. The exploring of this dissertation is just an attempt to approach it, even a tip of an iceberg especially when we cognize an unlock world that the concept of implied author has presented. Therefore, it is impelling us to constantly approach to unknown space and new possibilities.
|
PDF Full Text Request