Tongdu Adjustable God Acupuncture Treatment Of Liver Stagnation And Spleen Deficiency Type Chronic Fatigue Syndrome’s Clinical Curative Effect Observation

Chronic fatigue syndrome (chronic fatigue, syndrome, CFS) is a new disease in new discovery of modern medicine, the cause of the disease so far is not clear from the that is associated with mental disorders or viral infection, through the clinical observation and treatment in recent years, thought and psychology, sleep, endocrine and movement, neural, genetic, immune, personality differences and exercise habits and other factors are related. The rhythm of life is the way than ever rapidly under the condition of body function, and can not adapt to the individual can load the performance for a long time as prominent symptoms and extreme fatigue, sleep more, fatigue, cognitive decline, not only ability weakness and some physical symptoms, such as headache, joint pain, and throat itching, aching muscles as the feature is a series of clinical syndrome. The difference with the healthy people appeared persistent fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome patients is due to the presence of significant fatigue status of discomfort, resulting in daily activities, the function of the body are threatened. What is more, in the life will become more and more intense trend of today’s urban life, can be seen in clinical complaints of patients with fatigue is increasing, therefore, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (Center for Disease Control CDC) estimation of chronic fatigue syndrome will be the century of the main problems affecting human health.ObjectiveTraditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine believe that chronic fatigue syndrome such as paying no attention to treatment will continuously on the body caused by adverse effects, healthy and sustained damage, cause more health problems, seriously affect the quality of life and traditional Chinese medicine for chronic fatigue syndrome of a disease clinical efficacy than the Western ideal, the treatment has the advantages of non-toxic side effects.With nowadays social environment under the influence, the disease incidence rate rising, has been developed for today’s society of a kind of common disease. Therefore, the research for the disease by the most effective method of treatment, so as to enhance the efficacy of this disease, is meaningful. Premise of the filing of the treatment in the clinical course of the disease was observed in patients with the disease has the air loss characteristics, so this paper in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) air theory as the basis, choose "God", the purpose of which is to use "God" to the concept of tonic and treatment of liver stagnation and spleen deficiency type chronic fatigue syndrome as the research object.MethodsThe random method, the patients into the treatment group with adjustable God complement virtual Tongdu God acupuncture treatment; control group I to the reference acupuncture science textbook (people’s Medical Publishing House, Xu Ji Ping Zhao, editor in chief, the presiding Shi Xuemin.) internal organs dialectical acupoint selection acupoint acupuncture treatment; control group Ⅱ to abdominal needle therapy can tonifying qi and strengthening the air entraining Guiyuan method acupuncture treatment, one treatment every other day, three times per week treatment, were treated for four weeks. Before and after treatment, the comprehensive efficacy of three methods, the fatigue symptom score (FS-14), the fatigue symptom score and the chronic fatigue syndrome, were evaluated, and the comparison between the two methods was carried out.ResultsFatigue gauge (FS-14)The physical fatigue, the statistical analysis, the three groups after the treatment score and the treatment before the score compared with the treatment to reduce P<0.01, there are significant differences, the three groups have better treatment effect. Comparison between the three groups of group:treatment group and control group 1 (P> 0.05) that no significant difference; treatment group and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) that had a significant difference, the treatment group was better than that of the control group Ⅱ; control group Ⅰ and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) shows that there are significant differences, the control group I was better than that of the control group Ⅱ.Mental fatigue, the statistical analysis, the three groups after treatment and compared with the treatment before the score were reduced P<0.05, there are significant differences, the three groups have better treatment effect. Comparison between the three groups of group:treatment group and control group Ⅰ (P< 0.01) that there are significant differences, treatment group was superior to the control group Ⅰ; treatment group and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) that had a significant difference, the treatment group was better than that of the control group Ⅱ; Ⅰ and control group Ⅰ (P> 0.05) showed no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group. Fatigue Scale total score (physical fatigue score+mental fatigue score) aspects, by statistical analysis, three groups of treatment score before and after treatment score compared were decreased (P< 0.01), there were significant differences, indicating that all three groups have good therapeutic effect. Between the three groups Fatigue Scale total score groups: treatment group and control group Ⅰ:P< 0.05 that there were significant difference, the treatment group was superior to control group Ⅰ; treatment group and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) that had a significant difference, the treatment group was better than that of the control group Ⅱ; Ⅰ and control group Ⅱ:P> 0.05 shows no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group.Fatigue symptom score:By statistical analysis, before and after the treatment, the fatigue symptom score compared three groups after treatment with integral treatment of integral compared were decreased (P< 0.01), there were significant differences, indicating that all three groups have good therapeutic effect. Was compared between the three groups group:treatment group and control group Ⅰ:P< 0.05 indicates that there were significant difference, the treatment group was superior to control group Ⅰ; treatment group and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) that had a significant difference, the treatment group was better than that of the control group Ⅱ; Ⅰ and control group Ⅱ:P> 0.05 shows no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group.Comprehensive effect evaluation: In the treatment group,11 cases were cured, markedly effective in 9 cases, improved in 8 cases,2 cases ineffective, the total efficiency is 93.33%; the control group Ⅰ,6 cases were cured,7 cases were markedly effective, improved in 10 cases,7 cases were ineffective, the total efficiency of 76.67%; control group Ⅱ,5 cases were cured,7 cases were markedly effective, improved in 12 cases,6 cases were ineffective, the total efficiency of was 80.00%. After statistical analysis, the treatment group and the control group (P< 0.05), indicating that there was significant difference between the two groups, treatment group was superior to the control group Ⅰ; treatment group and control group Ⅱ (P< 0.05) that there was significant difference between the two groups, treatment group was better than that of the control group Ⅱ; the control group Ⅰ and control group Ⅱ (P> 0.05) that between the two groups no significant difference.The difference of the indexFor indicators to evaluate the data and calculate the difference before and after treatment of the two groups by statistical analysis compared treatment groups with respect to physical fatigue effect and the control group 1, and better than that of the control group II, more than mental fatigue, fatigue table total score, fatigue symptoms integral, treatment group are better than two groups control group. The effect of the treatment group was better than the other two groups.For the control group I, the body fatigue, mental fatigue, fatigue, fatigue symptom score of the difference between the four aspects was not statistically significant, the difference between the two groups were similar. The efficacy of the 2 groups was explained.Conelusion1. The treatment group and the control group Ⅰ, control group Ⅱ three kinds of acupuncture therapy in treatment of liver depression and spleen deficiency type chronic fatigue syndrome have a certain effect.2. The total score, fatigue symptom score, comprehensive effect evaluation, and the difference of the treatment group were better than the two groups in the control group, and the effect of the two groups were similar.3. The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome by the way of the acupuncture and the regulation of the divine acupuncture.