| In recent years, with the continuous improvement of living standards. people in the pursuit of living space at the same time. more and more people put forward to higher requirement of the residential environment. The decoration industry, Known as "the final beautician of construction' become the hottest new gold, and in this context is the Family fitment pollution become more and more sharp and prominent. Consumers are facing three difficulties:decorate difficult, check-in difficult, and rights difficult.Legal responsibility of family fitment pollution is still have no unified conclusion. The environment infringement theory, Quality infringement theory, and competition-collaboration theory are popular theory. The author tends to the last theory. The author also believe that if the consumers want to realize their aspirations they can choose the following order, first, environmental infringement suit, second, product quality infringement suit, and the last is breach of contract suit. This can maximize the protection of the interests of consumers.In this paper, the author first described the facts of the case and trial process, and pointed out that the controversy over the case of domestic outfit pollutes is the qualitative of legal liability. Secondly, contrast and analysis the dispute jurisprudential of the case. Finally, the author Research the legislative and judicial status of family fitment. Research and analysis the family decorate, the family fitment pollution, and the legal responsibility of family fitment pollution. Recommendations improve relevant laws according to focus of controversy. Recommendations Improve relevant laws According to Focus of controversy. Also based on this case and related cases of in-depth study, from how to make up the existing loopholes in the law, from the construction side of the qualification examination to the signing of the contract, from the pre-monitoring to the latter part of the remedy, the author from a practical point of view put forward my own view. |