A Clinical Control Study For The Technique Of Stereotactic To Aspirate With Tube And Craniotomy With Small Bone Hole To Treat Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Of Basal Ganglion

Objective By comparing operation effect between the technique of stereotactic to aspirate with tube and craniotomy with small bone hole to treat hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglion .To objective evaluate the curative effect of the technique of stereotactic to aspirate with tube to treat hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglion.Methods 40 cases with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglion were operated with the technique of stereotactic to aspirate with tube between 1999 and 2006, which named stereotactic group. 35 cases with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglion were operated with small bone hole were screened out which suited for stereotactic group at haemorrhage quantity and consciousness status between 1999 and 2006 in our hospital, which named small bone hole group. A retrospective method was used to compare the effect and difference of the two group. The near-term outcome (GOS scale), long-term outcome (Barthel scale), as well as the mortality rate, the satisfactory rate were compared respectively.Results There were no significant differences of the near-term outcome (GOS scale),long-term outcome (Barthel scale), as well as the mortality rate, the satisfactory rate between the two groups.Conclusion It suggests that using the technique of stereotactic to aspirate with tube has similar effects in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage of basal ganglion with craniotomy with small bone hole. But the technique of stereotactic to aspirate withtube is more safe and convenient.