Font Size: a A A

Periconceptional Exposure To Air Pollutants Associated With Birth Defects Study

Posted on:2011-02-26Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J Y ZhengFull Text:PDF
GTID:2154360308474059Subject:Obstetrics and gynecology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between the exposures to air pollutions (SO2, NO2, and PM10) during maternal pregnant and the risk of birth defects.Methods: Epidemiology Research methods: A population-based case- control study was conducted to analysis the relationship between birth defects and SO2, NO2, PM10. The data of birth defects was collected from 20 hospitals in the six districts of Tianjin, an industrial city in the North of China. The data used to be compared was also collected from the same hospitals during the same period (date of birth<30days). The data of the ambient pollutions was offered by Environmental Monitoring Centre of Tianjin. The average density of the air pollutions per month was collected from January 2001 to December 2007 in the six districts of Tianjin. The case–control groups maternal individual level of air pollutions were offered by the related departments of Beijing city. The Latitude and longitude of the every maternal Residence were calculated. First, Epidata software was applied to edit the database of case-control groups from January 2001 to December 2007. Second, the related Confounding factors were removed from the database. 459 Cases and 1080 controls were selected. The date of maternal individual air pollution concentration was input. The complete database was imported into software and corrected.Result: 1 The first six types of the birth defects were: Congenital heart disease (107 cases), Distal limb deformities (90 cases), Ear formation (46 cases) ,Cleft Lip and Palate (43 cases), NTD (37cases)。The mother of case group at being pregnant month was high proportion at months 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12. The control group of mothers at the beginning of the pregnant have the opposite trend: the higher ratio happens at 4th, 5th, 7th and 8th month. The month of case group maternal at the beginning of the pregnant which number of heating period constitute ratio was 53.38%; the constituting ratio during the non-heating period was 46.62%. In Control group the constituting ratio during the heating period was 41.11%; the constituting ratio in the number of non-heating period was 58.89%; X2 = 19.60, P = 0.00, the number of case group maternal at pregnant month during the heating period constituting ratio was higher than that of the control group (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.65).2 Statistical analyses of Air pollutants SO2, NO2, PM10:2.1 Analysis the balance of three air pollution concentrations distribution among the six districts during the same period from January 2001 to December 2007. There was no significant difference of the SO2 concentration in the six districts in the same month in addition to January (X2 = 13.00, P = 0.023) and December (X2 = 11.47, P = 0.043). NO2 concentration in addition to October (X2 = 8.65, P = 0.124), November (X2 = 8.238, P = 0.144), the rest months of NO2 concentration were significantly different in the administrative regions (P < 0.05). PM10 concentrations in the same period have not significant difference (P > 0.05).2.2 Comparison concentration in the heating period and non-heating period in the years of 2001 - 2007, three kinds of air pollutants whether had difference between of the six areas. SO2, NO2 concentration in the heating period was significantly higher than that of non-heating period. PM10 concentration in the year of 2002 (P = 0.337), 2005 (P = 0.055), 2007 (P = 0.201) in the heating and non-heating period have no significant difference. PM10 concentrations during the heating period in the remaining years was higher than that of the non-heating period (all P <0.05).3 Analysis the correlation between Birth defects and the air pollutants (SO2, NO2, PM10) concentrations:3.1 Case group maternal in the one month before pregnancy, the 1st month, the 2nd months in early pregnancy and the first trimester of SO2 concentration was significantly higher than perinatal exposure to maternal corresponding average SO2 month exposure concentration (t > 0, P < 0.05). Cases group of perinatal maternal pre-pregnancy the first 2 months, 1 month before pregnancy, early pregnancy and 1 month, the beginning of the first 2 month pregnant, 3 months before pregnancy and 3 months in early pregnancy NO2 exposure was significantly higher than the average of control group, perinatal maternal exposure to the corresponding month of the average concentrations of NO2 (t > 0, P < 0.05). There was no significant statistical difference of PM10 exposure between case and control groups'mother in the month which is 3 months before pregnancy and during pregnancy.3.2 Chi-square test showed there was no significant difference between case -control groups'maternal Periconceptional period in the heating and non-heating period (X2 = 2.890, P = 0.089, OR = 1.623, CI 95% 0.927 - 2.839).3.3 Correlation analysis between types of birth defects and air pollutants: Compare to the type of birth defects ranked in the top six and control group Perinatal maternal exposed to three kinds of air pollutants. There is positive correlation between the incidence of congenital heart disease and NO2 pollutants of which Pregnant mother in the 3 months before pregnancy and 3 months in early pregnancy. There was significant difference between limb shortening deformity newborn children maternal in the 3 months before pregnancy and Periconceptional exposure to air pollutants NO2 with the control groups mothers to the same period. Multi-finger or toe deformities maternal in the 3 months before pregnancy exposure to NO2 air pollutants with the control group's was significant difference.4 Multivariate analyses of several possible risk factors in the role of the three air pollutants associated with birth defects.To compare maternal pregnant age, gravidity, parity, perinatal fetal gestational age and perinatal weight, 3 months before pregnant and 3 months in the early pregnant of pollutants concentration. The statistically significant factors were: gravidity, perinatal fetal gestational age and the first month NO2 of pregnant. Gravidity and perinatal fetal gestational age were protective factors .The first month of NO2 was risk factors. Conclusion: 1 The concentration of SO2,NO2 in heating period was higher than that in the non-heating period. 2 Case group concentration of SO2,NO2 in 3 months before pregnant and the first trimester was higher than that of the control group. 3 The case group rate of number in heating period was higher than that of control group. 4 Congenital heart diseases, limb shortening, multiple means or toe deformity and the pregnant mother in the 3 months before pregnancy and exposure to NO2 in the presence of positive correlation. 5 3 months before pregnancy and 3 months in early pregnant were critical periods affecting on birth defects. In those critical periods, pregnant women exposure to high concentrations of air pollutants SO2, NO2 will increase the risk of birth defects. 6 The concentration of NO2 in the month of the beginning of the pregnant will increase the risk of birth defect. The gravidity of women and gestational age were protective factors of birth defect.
Keywords/Search Tags:birth defect, air pollution, SO2,NO2,PM10
PDF Full Text Request
Related items