Analyze "Follow Up A Victory That Revenue" Of The War Between China And France

Year from December 1883 to April 1885, between China and France since the outbreak of war in Vietnam, the war is divided into two phases. The first territory was in northern Vietnam. The second stage was to the Yunnan region of China, and even expanded to the southeast of China coastal areas. Team in the outcome of Sino-French War, historians traditionally considered "lost China defeated France victorious and wins," and in this article, the author describes five parts, describes the view that the "follow up a victory that income" is the clear Government helpless, but it is also relatively optimal policy.The first part of the review section, which is divided into three paragraphs, first review and summarize the past 120 years, Sino-French War scholars you "follow up a victory that is closing" the end of the main views, citing that China is undefeated The lost perspective, and that the Sino-French War "follow up a victory that revenue" is a more sensible view of some scholars, and analysis of the main ideas; The process of writing the second paragraph of this article listed in the bibliography, and research ideas, primarily through the perspective of international relations research; the third paragraph, stated the innovation of this study, and traditional historians with a different perspective, and for further details on the different evaluation of the results of Sino-French War. In the second part, a brief comparison of the two countries, China and France, China and France at the time described the economic situation and military strength in the gap between the two countries of the battlefield situation and the prevailing political situation. The third part discusses the different between China and France are facing the international situation, France is the European continent in the face of Britain, Germany and other European countries such as Japan and emerging support for the United States, while China is facing a tributary of East Asia system collapse, and its dangerous instability around the border state of China's relatively speaking, more complex than France in the international situations. The fourth part examines China's internal policy, the starting point of the rulers, the Qing court was divided into the main battle, and owners and the internal factions, and each faction has constituted by different factions, each faction is in their purpose, the policy of Sino-French War of the different policies, others favor an active fight, should not "follow up a victory that is received", and has advocated the " Sum War ", and they made their recommendations are supported by different reasons. Within the Qing court officials by comparing policy options, to more clearly see the ruler as the ruling class, led by Li, who not only understand the domestic situation, a better understanding of the international situation changes, so the proposed policy is relatively more reasonable and objective. They understand that China does not have the strength to go on a long fight, so "follow up a victory that revenue" can be a frustration, but the relatively best results. In this paper, the fifth part in the international relations theory, the most accurate interpretation of Sino-French War "follow up a victory that is closing," the foreign policy point is that "weak countries no diplomacy", in a case of national power shortage, it is not can we talk about equality of diplomacy.At the end of this article, I want to express the view that "follow up a victory that revenue" is relatively the Qing government at the time the most reasonable and most consistent with national interests of a policy option, although he is helpless choice, but also the optimal.