Philosophical Comprehension To Desire Of Text

Literature is one of the way of expressing desire. Traditionally,people considered that author expressed private desire . People ascribedthe desire of text to the effort of private writing . They blamed author ortext because they think author or text allured the reader to imitate thedesire of text and author or text must be responsible for reader . Thearticle critisizes the traditional standpoint and attempts to educe my own'sinterpretation of the desire of text . Firstly ,the article analyzes Don Quijote's image , critisizes thetriditional idea briefly . Then , I endorse that modern hermeneutics hadrevealed the mistery of Don Quijote as a reader . On the other hand , Icritisize they can't point out the limit that reader imitate the desire of textin the course of reading . Don Quijote regard the world of literatureappreciated by readers as the world of his own living and confused thelimit of the two different world . In a way , Don Quijote's reading is afailure. Thereof , I bring forward what question the article should discussis desire of text . 43The article examined into the relation between desire of text andauthor and the reading . There is universal error in the apprehending fordesire of text in the history of literature and of literary criticism . Thearticle critisized traditional standpoint and put forward the idea that authorcan't provide desire of text , because it is only desire of group . Authoronly as a spokesman said the desire of group . He hasn't owned desirebecause author is only as a kind of identity and has owned the desire onlythat he as human being .Then , The article compared the desire of textwith the daydream , point out the different between them . Reader can find the desire of text by reading because author had putdesire in the text . Of course , there is discrepancy between reader'sfinding and author's expressing . In the precess of reading , reader followthe principle of reading's self-desire .The desire of text reader can find isall the self-desire.Reader had owned it in the heart before reading . Authorprovided only in the text the way of desire's concrete practice . Theessence that reader imitated the desire of text is the imitatation ofself-desire . Reader finished the imitatation by the way of desire'sconcrete practice that author provided .The imitatation act as the mode ofother's experience . Reader attained the purpose of testifying self-desireby through the before-mentioned way .They think so that author or textallured the reader to imitate the desire of text and author provided desireof text because they couldn't recognize carefully the relation between the 44desire of text and author and the reading . The original points of the article as follow : firstly ,recognized DonQuijote's image anew , point out the limit that Don Quijote couldn'toverstep as a readerï¼›Secondly , bring forward the concept of desire ofgroup ï¼›Thirdly , put forward the principle of reading's self-desire .Mostcontents of the article is the writer's personal idea of apprehendingliterature .Especially the last point , which may be interpret the diffcultquestion traditional reading theory couldn't solve. for example , thequestion of acceptance for swordsmen novel .