| Yu Hua is one of the nucleuses of avant-garde. From his twenty years writing we can find that he has been constructing two opposite worlds. In his early two well-known short stories Travel At Eighteen and The incident of April Third, he intentionally set the time of the stories at the age of eighteen, which gave clear borderline between adults and youngsters. His attitude to the world of adult and youngster didn't change until his Brothers. In his writings, he described the youngsters' world childishly, but expected readers to understand them as adults. This creates huge contrast. It seems that the two worlds can't be blend together.The essey tries to explore the true purpose of Yu Hua's writing. It first analyzes the characters of youngsters in his writings. If we take the characters as a whole, we can see that the youngsters were of the same characters. They were frailness, ignorance, loneliness and treachery. Youngsters with these characters shocked readers greatly. In reality, they are sufferers of violence, witnesses of tribulation. Their experience presents a striking contrast between them and adults.In chapter 3, the essay analyses the reason why the writer shaped youngsters this way. It was because the writer lacked love from his family, which affected his attitude to real life. Under the cultural circumstance of the day, affected by foreign culture, he cast his eyes upon the wickedness of humanity. He questioned about the truth of humanity in careful and sensitive way. He absorbed the vigor of style of Kafka,Luo primary - Gerry Ye in his writing, formed his own style of pursuing inner reality.In chapter 4, the essay expounds that this writing style is of the color of political apologue. In his writings, we can find many allegoric characteristics, such as uncertainty, ritual scenes, ironic style and recurrent narration. He communicated with the readers in the form of allegory.Yu Hua's works were allegories about society, which were made up of death, desire,... |
PDF Full Text Request