| In the field of literature criticism, the method of literature criticism is emerged in endlessly, from traditional methods of them (including historical-biographical, moral-philosophical) to the last one -post-colonialism criticism. But, almost every method of literature criticism cannot evasive it's limitation, because all of them analyse a great work on one side of its meaning only. My tutor, Mr. Zuzhao Gu, put forward a new integrative method of literature criticism to analyse a implicated work on all-side of meanings—Criticism of meanings on layers, on the premise that divides meanings of atext into three layers, language, visualization and meaning. There is more rationality on using this method to analyse a complex work, for its unique colligation and integrality.Don Quixote is a great work that stands the long time test, and attractsinnumerable readers in ages. Since Don Quixote was published, people havecomprehended its meanings from many sides, and they stick to their own point, never succumb to the other's. therefore, different age and different people have their own comprehensions on the work. So, by the means of a new method ofliterature criticism—Criticism of the meanings on layers to understand Don Quixote, I anticipated to achieve full-scale of its meanings relatively.Don Quixote is a funny and sorrow story, a work that makes readers taste deeply sorrow when they are laughing at scenario of story. This text divides the meaning of Don Quixote into three layers. The first layer is taste layer, toanalyse the comedy of absurdness and the tragedy of sublimity in Don Quixote. The second layer is history layer, to analyse that Don Quixote reflects the... |