A New Form Of Filmic Criticism

Traditional filmic criticism embodied by newspaper and magazine still holds their ground but come to decline. At the same time internet filmic criticism extends rapidly to a large range because of internet's simply operation, relatively freedom and equality. Internet criticism characterized by filmic forum and filmic Blog competes with traditional criticism for the readers. Meanwhile there appears a new kind of "filmic criticism" on the internet thoroughly different from the traditional filmic criticism and become more and more popular. It receives attention of "readers" not even by words but more direct and dramatic video or short film.When internet filmic critics produce by their fingers and keyset some criticism about film to spread on the internet, what is the difference between their feeling and traditional filmic critic's? When a filmic criticism is published on the internet page, and decorated with some hyperlinks of picture, video and words, and receive some responses of readers, what is the difference between it and traditional filmic criticism? When readers open an internet page to read a filmic criticism, what is the difference between his reading and traditional reading paper or magazine? Apart from the internet filmic criticism by text mode, how shall we qualify and deal with those kinds of video spreading widely, such as parody(or KUSO), that is, recomposition of some famous film? Can they be seen as a special criticism about film?Now traditional papery filmic criticism is awane, whereas filmic criticism based on new kind of medium such as internet become more and more popular, so it is necessary to discuss theoretically this new form of filmic criticism. This paper is to establish fundamental theory about this new form of filmic criticism regarding its existence, development, main characters, audience, etc., to help internet filmic criticism develops orderly and healthily!...