Spirit,Practice,Contact Rational- Road Of Rational Reconstruction

"Philosophy is just like the only hymn of reason for thousands of years, although it reckons as a completed knowledge of itself, and sometimes it misleads itself as achieving the knowledge, so it turns to look upon reason, and it is often hated by people for the burden lays on them which makes people unrest." However, the compliment of reason is replacing by a feast of escape of reason. Reason is not the essence of human beings, and the human beings are not the existence of reason any more. On contrary, reason is attacked, rejected and abandoned. Reason is not seen as a kind of strength of emancipation, on contrary, it turns to be a synonym of suppression and power. The belief of reason gives its way to the rational, and the crisis is the mark at present. Obviously, rational is becomes a problem at present, Reason develops with its own logic, and the root of its dilemma comes from the original presupposition of itself, and the reason from the splitting of reason in Enlightment is also one of the reasons which contradicts. The contradiction is Logos and Nous in content form, and on the formality, it is the unification of form and practice. The escape of reason of post-modernism is just a one-sided emphasis and self-show, and it is just self-denial of itself. The way reason faces would of course comes from one end to another, on the contrary, it should surpass, re-construct and interpret, it should re-read the hymn.There are two clear lines shown from reason itself if overview the history of reason development. On the one hand, there is a line of which reason develops from theory to practice; on the other hand, reason leads the way, and it goes from theory to practice, it turns from the "thinking" to the "practice". Under the domain of modern view, philosophy starts to search for the root of reason from practice which gets away from reason itself. From the perspective of thinking, reason turns philosophy from thinking to practice. On the one hand, with the development of the lines listed above, it is a development from the group, social and even the whole history of human beings. Reason is not the self-oriented deduction and the interactive interpretation, it is a kind of communicative reason, and it needs no denial of the truth, Authenticity is only transferred from "itself to "between". On the practice level, it turns from exclusion to sub-jectivity.There two basic lines hidden behind could be found in Kant, Hegel, Marx and Habemas theories. The study takes the critics and development from them on the theory, and acts as the source of the theory in present study. It shows the significance and value of the study, firstly, the development of the theory could deduce the theory. On the other hand, itsdiscussion on the theory itself offers the support for the theory to solve the dilemma atpresent .To be concrete, the study could be divided into four parts which discusses the reasonfor choosing and testifying the theme of the present study. The first part, it briefly introducesthe achievement and the dilemma of Enlighment, and it also makes clear of the narrowinterpretation of Enlightment, and the reason is that the leading of the theory makes the theoryovercomplex, and finally overlook the world where human beings existed. The second partanalyzes the question of paradox, it points out the weakness of the paladox of reason whichbases on the grasp of the knowledge of reason, however, confined to the limited situation, itrealizes in the other world. Hegel is aware of the reason for the causing of intellectual andunderstanding which is an one-sided development, and he redesigns the concept and itsdenotation and goes on to dig out the deep elements of Logos and Nous, it solves the problemwhich is in confliction and conciliation. However, Hegel just interprets the theory in his ownconsciousness, and there is still splitting points that are waiting to be solved, and thereconciliation of reason is just achieved in the mind. The third part mainly deals with thepractice of Maxs. The reconciliation of Hegel is changed to practice by Marx, and hesurpassed Hegel, it puts the reconciliation to the sensational objects, and he finally achievesthe authentic reconciliation in practice. The fourth part discusses the communicative reasonproposed by Habermas. The theory could be dated back to the practice theory of Marx, and itenhances the theory of labor practice proposed by Marx. The theory intends to find a newfoundation for his theory. Obviously, Harbermas misunderstands Maxs of his theory onpractice, and to some extent, his theory is more scientific, which benefits the practice andreconciliation in practice. Finally, at the conclusion part of the study, it briefly answers to therational construction of texts, and the study takes that the authentic reconciliation of reasonexists in the efforts of the rational reasoning, and the study also proposes that the Marxismshould be re-read, only in this way could the paradox be solved and the research could also besignificant and creative.