Comparison On Lin Shan And Xu Fuguan's Stylistic Eye About The Literary Mind And Carving Dragon

About the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon, Lin Shan and Xu Fuguan bring forward their own stylistic eye individually. The primary difference between them is the following.Firstly, on the issue about which characteristic theoretical treatise the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon is. Lin Shan considers it as a composition monograph. But Xu Fuguan thinks it is a literary theoretical monograph.Secondly, Lin Shan's style is considered as genre by Xu Fuguan. And Xu Fuguan's style is different from Lin Shan's. Thirdly, Lin Shan regards the stylistics as an aspect or a part theory of the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon. But,Xu Fuguan says it must be understood generally. The whole book of the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon can be looked upon as a stylistic monograph of Chinese classical literary theory. The cause of Lin and Xu's difference comes from Liu Xie's two new requests of stylistic eye, which is the new superorganic ontological request and the new subsurface methodology request.From the classical literary movement in Tang Dynasty , the stylistics inclines to the second one gradually. the author of anthology in Ming Dynasty is wild about stylistics and methodology.Of course, the research is entering its golden ages. And the author of anthology in Ming Dynasty's contribution to stylistics provides a pattern to the study on Chinese classical stylistics in contemporary and up-to-date times, demonstrating the direction,including the study on the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon. Lin Shan's opinion of the stylistics,with the characteristic of paying attention to the law and method,the writing practice,comes from them,too. Xu Fuguan is always sticking on the superorganic view of the Literary Mind and Carving Dragon. He thinks it is his ultimate aim to probe into the stylistics literary ontology. The choice has something to do with his adhereing to Han Wei and the Six Dynasty's literary theory position, his new Confucian master's learning background ,his wisdom of the western literary theory's influence.I never want to have the judgement between their stylistic eyes. Both of their stylistic eyes aren't only rational,but also unilateral.And their theories each can fit for their own lingual territory. We shouldn't only see their opposite facts,but also their coexistence and their compatible latent probability. Both of their stylistics are necessary parts of study on Chinese classical stylistics.