Study On Hearing System Of Significant Administrative Decision-making

For our administrative decision-making system exists a lotof limitations and is influenced by the traditional officer basisthought deeply, blind decision and making policy arbitrarilyoften happen, which leads to many inappropriate decisions anderrors. This problem has already caused the high value of the Partyand Beijing leaderships, "the right decision is the importantpremise of various work that has succeed" is put forwarddefinitely in the Party 16. "We should perfect the decisionmechanism of which understands what the people live and feelthoroughly, reflects public sentiment, concentrates people'swisdom extensively and cherish people's dint actually to make thepolicy scientific and democratized. All the administrativedecision-making organizations want to perfect the rule and theprocedure Of the graveness policy, build up the reflection systemof public sentiment, establish the showing system and hearingsystem that relatedclosely with crowd's benefits and importantitems, perfect expert consulted system, practice the argumentsystem of the decision and the responsibility system to preventfrom decision at will". The significant administrative decision-making hearing system means that, before the Administration Organizationmake a important decision relation society and public benefits,the Administration Organization hold a meeting with the relevantrepresentative participates and expert's scholar, and hear theparty's concerned of opinions extensively and do a decision onthis foundation to promote decision democratization, scientificprocedure system. The significant administrative decision-makinghearing system is the important system of perfecting gravenessdecision rule and the procedure, it is advantageous to make policyscientificly, the democratizely and standardizely and prevent thedecision from blindness or at will; It is advantageous to raisecitizen participated levels and guarantee its rights; It isadvantageous to strengthen the clarity of the decision.After introduces the theories and knowledge of the significantadministrative decision-making and hearing system, this articlecombines the two principles and puts forward the principle of thesignificant administrative decision-making and hearing systemthat should following. The third part makes use of a comparableanalytical method to compare the concrete contents of that havealready released significant administrative hearing system ineveryplace, to find out the shortages and advantages of them. Atthe same time, it analyses the significant administrative decision-making and hearing system in everyplace and points outthe problem during the course of fulfillment. The fouth partcombines the relevant theories and puts forward the concreteperfect measures on the basis of the blemishes and shortages inlawmaking and practice which mentioned in the third part.