Comparative Research On School Choice Of Compulsory Education Between China And USA

School Choice problems exist in both China and America .because of differentissues on the traditional culture, natural environment, the stage of economicdevelopment, political system and so on in the two countries, the content ,objectivesand the premise of the system designed on school choice demonstrate more bigdifference. The United States tries to deconstruct the system carried out by modernbureaucracyat thecoreofarational andscientific andtechnological power monopolythrough"School Choice", so that education can develop in the direction of autonomyand plurality to adapt to the needs of post-industrial era in the community. China isundergoingadramaticchangeofthesocialbackgroundconflictsbetweenhigh-qualityeducational resources and the public's demand for education highlight show theSchool Choice,andthecomprehensiveimprovement intheexistingsystem is obvious.Studying the causes of School Choice problem of the two countries, the norms modellaw and sociology followed the in resolving the issue of selecting school, bothimplicitpremiseoftheframeworkformationofthetwosystems, andbypublicchoicetheory-based analysis knowing whether Two School Choice system can solve theproblem, to what extent can achieve its stated objectives is major theoretical premiseofourcountryinthefundamentalsolutiontoproblemsfacedbytheSchoolChoice.Due to the failure of the Keynesian doctrine of national policies and variousdefects of the old education system exposed, The United States has established aselectingschoolsystemonbasisofanewliberalism,theNewInstitutionalEconomics,andthenewmanagement.AmericanSchool Choicepolicydevelopedfrom its"BrownAct"to"countries in the risk"and to"No Child Left Behind",from the mandatoryracialquotastothemagnetplan,openenrolment,educationvouchersystemandtotheoverall education system changes historically. China due to the lack of qualityeducational resources and changes in the structure of societyand the public desire forquality education has School Choice problems in compulsory education, and itsvalues has developed from the experience"absolutely fair"to"giving priority toefficiency with due consideration to fairness"and to"comprehensive fair view"of evolution. Its School Choice policyexperienced from"monopolyof public school"to"focusingonthekeyschools"throughpromotingthebalanceddevelopmentofprivateeducation and to stage of the overall management. The United States set up majorsystems architecture including magnet schools, charter schools, private schools andhome schools, mainly in the forms of and education vouchers, open enrolment andeducation tax relief. China follows the nearest schooling, conversion of schoolownership, one fee system, the balanced strategy to address the issue of selectingschoolsystemarrangements.Pursuitofthemostbasichumanvaluesandage-specificvaluesaswellastensionof the pursuits between personal and social values makes the very complexity of theeducation reform. Education reform, in essence, is in pursuit of a choice or balanceamong different values. Two countries have different premises in the view of therelationship among the efficiency, equality and individual freedom and how to makebalance on School Choice, resulting in the framework of Chinese system on SchoolChoicebythemodern bureaucracy.Chinese modernbureaucraticsystem of educationat the core of The traditional patriarchal ethics and interpersonal with its nondescripthas always been difficult to change the system inevitably, leading to a single goal ofeducation, institutional rigidities, and the simplicity of evaluation criteria, unclearproperty rights, pluralism demands difficult to express, innovation power shortageproblems.However,the UnitedStatesrecognizedbythenaturaldefectsofthesystem,in the post-modern vision of the non-center and autonomous decision-makingdiscourse is pupating the butterflies, with the characteristics of the rise ofmulticultural education, independent schools emerged, the concept of lifelongeducation deepened, improvement of the market mechanism, a autonomous educationsystemistakingshape.School Choice issue represents characteristics of the times, such as the energycrisis, environmental degradation, population increase, the employment pressurecontinued to intensify, and also shows public fear and helplessness to a single modeloftheindustrialera.SchoolChoiceisnotonlytochooseaschool,butmoreimportantto choose an education. The arrival of the information era is a signal of digestion to strength of the authority, different groups'and different levels of knowledge willintersect, consult and Construct. Asingle dominant mainstream culture will transformto the development of multi-cultural, the trend of multi-cultural integration andreorganization is strengthening. People no longer fascinate anysingle model and pathfortheirlifeanddevelopment.China'spotentialcrisiseducationsystemisgivingbirthtoaprofoundeducationreform.Choose their own development education is a fundamental right of citizens andthe driving force to maintain vigor of education. It should be fully protected andrespected. Because School Choice and unreasonable the School Choice form havebeen misunderstood in China, we follow a simple approach on the issue of SchoolChoice issue. Therefore, continuing to promote the balanced development ofeducation, and expanding the scale of investment in education channels,implementing an open admission policy, the pilot education voucher system,establishingcharter schools to clear the relationship among governments, schools andsociety as well as improving education organization and education services securitysystem are not only fundamental policy to resolve School Choice issue, but also amajorstrategicchoiceconfrontingchangesinChina'seducationsystem.