| Objective: To investigate the tumor targeting efficacy of [18F]FDG-RGD and Al18F-NOTA-RGD2,two novel radio tracers containing Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid(RG D) peptides. By comparison of advantages and disadvantages of the two methods, it is hopeful to provide reference data for future research of 18F-labeled peptide ra diopharmaceuticals.Methods: [18F]FDG-RGD was synthesized by an aminooxy-functionalized RGD pe ptide and a [18F]FDG. Al18F-NOTA-RGD2 was synthesized in one-step by conjugat ing NOTA-RGD2 with 18F-AlF3.Labeling conditions, radiochemistry yield, specific a ctivity of labeling products, radiochemistry purity, stability in vitro and pharmacoki netics of final products were compared. The tumor targeting efficacy and in vivo biodistribution profile of [18F]FDG-RGD and Al18F-NOTA-RGD2, following intrave nous injection via the tail vein, were evaluated in nude mice model bearing U87 M G glioblastoma.Results: Both[18F]FDG-RGD and Al18F-NOTA-RGD2 could readily label RGDf K p eptide with 18 F,with a yield of about(13-15)% and(17-25)%.[18F]FDG-RGD could produce radiolabeled peptides with better specific activity, while Al18F-NOTA-RG D2 is proved to be a more time-saving method. For stability test, more than 80% of both [18F]FDG-RGD and Al18F-NOTA-RGD2 could maintain intact in PBS or H SA within 360 min, and about 50% radiolabeled peptides could survive in vivo. T he radioactivity biodistribution did not show obvious differences.Conclusions: The synthetic process of Al18F-NOTA-RGD2 is more efficient and le ss time cosuming. The in vitro and in vivo stability of [18F]-RGD obtained in bot h methods were excellent. But in the biodistribution pattern of radiolabeled product s,Al18F-NOTA-RGD2 has better tumor-targeting characteristics,and it is more condu cive to clinical promotion. |