A Study On The Current Situation And Intervention Of Impulsive Behavior Of Left - Behind Children In Primary Schools

As a product of China’s urbanization, left-at-home children are those who live with other legal guardians during school age because of one or both parents are migrant stayers. They are different from other children in many aspects, such as education, livelihood, emotion on account of leaving parents too early and lacking of parents’concern. Unique growth environment makes them become self-contemptuous, nervous, uncomfortable which emerge in the form of impulsive behavior and autism. So mental health status is of great importance to both individuals, families and schools.This research mainly uses the cluster random sampling, choosing a total of 583 students from 20 senior classes in two rural primary schools in Taizhou. With the help of Barratt impulsiveness scale, investing and studying their situation of impulsive behavior. Finally based on the principle of free will, selecting 20 left-behind children who get relatively high scores to do study on intervention, including group hypnosis and group psychological counseling. And then comparing the intervention results to seek for more proper ways to improve the impulsive behavior of left-behind children. The conclusions are as follows:(1) Grade differences exist in impulsiveness scores and other dimension (P<0.05) in 3 to 6 grade primary school students. The higher grade, the more severe impulsive behavior.(2) Left-behind children have significant differences between other children in cognitive and unplanned impulsiveness (P<0.05) and the total scores (P<0.01), but in the dimension of motorial impulsiveness there exist small differences.(3) Both gender left-behind children have impulsive behavior (p>0.05)(4) Group hypnosis intervention has a great effect on the total scores and other dimensions of impulsive behavior of the left-behind children.(5) Group psychological counseling intervention has a great effect on improving the total scores and other dimensions of impulsive behavior of primary left-behind children (p<0.05).(6) Significant differences exist in improving the total scores of the impulsive scale between group hypnosis and group psychological counseling intervention. And obviously hypnosis group is superior than the other group (p<0.01).(7) The delayed measuring results of hypnosis intervention group are superior to the results in time (p<0.05). Otherwise the results of the psychological counseling group are opposite. According to the delayed measuring results, the effect of group hypnosis intervention is better than group psychological intervention (p<0.05).