On The Second Time In 1956-1961 Years In South Jiangsu Controversy

After the conflict with the Soviet Union from 1948 to 1953, facing the political pressure, economic blockade and military threat from the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia gradually got rid of ideological restraint, took the interests of the state as basic reference on formulating foreign policy, and gradually chose the socialism road of autonomy.In 1953, after Stalin's death, to against Imperialist camp led by the U.S., to consolidate and strengthen his status, the Soviet union implemented liberalizing policies and detented strategy to the eastern European countries, trying to restore the socialist bloc internal unity. To make the socialist bloc unity become "iron piece" instead of "leaderless", it is critical and priority to re-establish diplomatic relations with Yugoslavia. Khrushchev went to Yugoslavia to have initiative suggestion of reconciliation in May 1955 and Tito visited the Soviet Union in June 1956. Soviet Union and Yugoslavia had Belgrade declaration in 1955 and Moscow declaration in 1956, which officially marked the ending of seven years'conflict. But their friendly relationship had not lasted long and then became cool. Differences and crack caused by their debate from 1956 to 1961, made the relationship between the two countries down to the bottom.The factors leading to frequently-changed relationship between Soviet Union and Yugoslavia were complex. Based on historical facts and theory of international relations,the paper uses analytic hierarchy process,which is basic research method of international relations,to explore and thoroughly analyze the facts from international,national and individual dimension. Second controversies by Soviet Union and Yugoslavia broke out for several reasons. Secret report made by Khrushchevon the Twentieth Congress of the Communist Party of Soviet Union lead to the Austro-Hungarian events,which was the fuse of second controversies.Meanwhile,the United States pushed peaceful evolution strategy,and used"wedges plan" to support Tito socialist to weaken the Soviet Union's control on Eastern Europe, undoubtedly promoting for the second controversies. But the fundamental reason is the irreconcilable contradictions between the two things, great-power chauvinism,big party powers work style of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia's abandoning Stalin mode to take independent development road, pursuing non-aligned diplomatic strategy. The two countries had a debate around the cause and properties of the Austro-Hungarian events,as well as ideology,economic and trade, relationship between the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe,and development pattern of Eastern Europe. Controversy situation developed in-depth and upgraded, and had the characteristics of being fierce first,slowed later, and ups and downs.The essence of debate is the state sovereignty and national interest's conflict between Soviet hegemonism and power politics and Yugoslavia advocating independence,getting rid of Stalin mode,which was the passing of their first conflict in essence. In a sense, the second controversy between Soviet Union and Yugoslavia is the continuation of the first conflict.