| In essence, "the secondary landmarks" usually have the preservative values of the cultural relics in city. There is a structure or a group of buildings which place in the vague demarcation line between preservation and dismantlement, the traditional division of architectural classification may not appropriate for the kinds of cultural relics, it ought to be reexpounded. The practical peculiarities of "the secondary landmarks " are that neither of them could completely be measured with the cultural values or economical values, as their various value elements do not tower above the rest, they are all in eguilibrium. The various value elements of "the secondary landmarks" are developing together in the process of canceling each other. The peculiarities of "the secondary landmarks" determine that they should be considered from different angles (social, economical and technical elements, etc.) simultaneously, so as to raise the capacity of estimation from the preservation of an original single cultural value.Nowadays, during the project of landmarks is being worked out, the departments concerned lay more stress on the limits of architectural forms (height, material and colour, etc.) or material standard of the objects and the improvement of conditions, in comparison with less making a deep investigation and studying on the implement of economic costs, the process of operation and feasibility, so a lot of laws and regulations in this respect are unable being fulfilled in the practical work, as a result it could hardly effect the development of the city conditions now. Although the laws and regulations of preservative cultural relics for "the secondary landmarks" have been provided clearly, yet the problems such as funds and so on are unable being put into effect from beginning to end, the so-called preservation is no more than "No dismantling". In peking outdated city, the universal and prominent problem is that the contradictions between preservation of cultural relics and city dwellers living conditions are becoming increasingly acute, a lot of landmarks have been damaged seriously, thus it reduces the living conditions of the city dwellers too.The traditional remnents mingle with modern life closely, and the city management and city design try to keep the integration of historical forms through the method as simple and extensive area as the method in keeping apart the landmarks, it goes without saying that it is impossible. We should be aware that the current renovation of "the secondary landmarks" is carrying out in the existing city, so on this basis, the management and design aiming at the construction and integration of space and form had never been "pure and simple", in other words, in the process of renovation, we have to confront the existing forms, the existing citizen, the existing culture in the city. As for "the secondary landmarks", the preservation and the intervention of new elements are closely, related, the object of preservation is also the object of the new intervening elements, simultaneously. The preservation of "the secondary landmarks" aiming chiefly at the development should work for mixing up the landmarks in the modern life.The author holds that, as for "the secondary landmarks", we should neither stand completely on the basis of the guardians of cultural relics, nor takes completely the viewpoints from the angle of capital ,we should keep the diversity and continuity of the social resident composition and architectural form to avoid the excessive aristocratism of outdated city, nowadays the promotion of vitality of the outdated city is the almost goal of the renovation of peking outdated city. |