Multiple Deconstruction Game

Jacques Derrida is the representative personage of deconstruction, and whose influence spreads the European and American mainland. As a representative of deconstruction, Derrida deconstructed the philosophy of ontology from the era of Plato to Heidegger's philosophy of "existence - On the theological". "Deconstruction" is Derrida's philosophical stand. According to Heidegger, the meaning of "Deconstruction" was"destruction" or"the rescission of structure". However, in Derrida's view, "Deconstruction" is equivalent neither to the total destruction, nor to Hegel's "approving and abandoning", but a kind of criticism on the unity of symbol, self-presence of the speech, language and the unity of presence and so on. The deconstruction of Derrida contains "construct" factors. And Derrida consider deconstruction as a strategy, a pleasure and a game.This thesis consists of five parts.Brief introduction provides relative information, such as the introduction about Jacques Derrida and his academic research, the literature review and the significance of the research, etc.Part one mainly discusses the philosophical foundation and origin of Derrida's concept of"the nature of literature". Derrida held that philosophy of the past is actually"voice logic Riggs Center" and, and deconstructed philosophy of the past by means of his philology. These terms , such as " différance ","trace","substitute", etc, reflect the philosophy of the nature of Derrida's deconstruction and are the foundation of his "essence of literature ". Derrida negate the essence of literature, and held that literature is a search for certainty in the process of uncertainty. Literature is a dynamic intention relationship, whose theoretical origin includes both the origins of the phenomenon literary theory and the existentialism literary theory. In addition, Derrida's "the nature of literature" concept was also influenced by the practice of literary creation, in particular, the influence of the modern practice of literary creation represented by Joyce.Part Two is mainly about multiple deconstruction of "the nature of literature" of Derrida.Derrida firstly made deconstruction on the ideological concepts level of literature and pointed out that literature was not only a fiction of establishment, but also a fictitious establishment which leads to a kind of literature being a kind of open text. Secondly, he deconstructed literature on the level of relationship between literature and law and pointed out that literature was not stipulated by any law. The law was deconstructed through the fictitious narrative of literature which transcends itself and develops into an open end. Thirdly, he made deconstruction of literature on the level of the relationship of literature and truth, cancelled certainty of imitation using the "hymen logic", thereby eliminating the existence of the truth, and further pointed out literature's uncertainty. Fourthly, Derrida deconstructed literature on the level of relationship between literature and philosophy and pointed out that metaphor was the root as well as the final denotation of philosophy and literature which produced the paradoxical relationship of"be and be not"between literature and philosophy. And finally, Derrida deconstructed "the nature of literature" from the relationship between literature and philosophy and pointed out that literature nature was a dynamic intention relationship and a dynamic reference thereby eliminating the certainty of the nature of literature.Part Three mainly expounds the awareness of "the nature of literature" of Derrida. In this part, the first is Rotty's criticism on "the nature of literature" of Derrida which mainly includes three aspects: First, Derrida's limitation of ideological premises; second, the question of opening up of literature; third, the criticism on unification of literature and philosophy. The second is the contradictory quality of "the nature of literature" of Derrida. This part is mainly composed of the contradictory qualities of the nature of literature and literary function. In the end, it is the inspiration of "the nature of literature" of Derrida towards China's literary theory of the contemporary era.Conclusion is the author's summary of the above three chapters. The multiple Deconstruction of "the nature of literature" by Derrida is a serious game, a new start, and left the new thoughts towards literature to the people.