| The academic concepts and practical ways of ChenSihe are unique, and have extensive influence in our country in the present age. Through a dozen years of research and criticism practice in literature history, he not only integrated the history and the present age, the literature and literary criticism, but also reactivated the history. About contemporary literature, ChenSihe advocates that to grasp the history by the view of aesthetic level, and to reflect the contemporary value of history. So he writes personal literature history by the view of "diversity" and "whole".Then he proposes that literature is an "explain ". He mixes the writing of literature history into the process of literary criticism ,opens the space of "folk" by the criticism principle of "life", communicates his theory of aesthetic criticism concept——"tridimensional". Through this view, he uses "literariness" of literary characteristics to withdraw the development of the art of literary history, and then uses an artistic way of criticism and writing to remodel the literature. In the history he writes, the "humanistic spirit" is the core clues to run-through it. On the basis, his position of the contemporary of literature value formed.More over, in conformity with his literature-history dear in the specific operation , reveal his great effort practice in congenial with the ancient and modern literature aesthetic content,but perform with modern Chinese and western critical theory. Therein, he takes the practice in the literary criticism construction of the concept discretion when he constructed the history of literature contents. Therefore, in its history of literature idea and the literature critique practice, there are available space for explore and merit borrow worth for academic. This thesis will edge in with observe for his history of literature concept and practice construct for sight and value position, as well as his history of literature's feature and the write base--the major node for his history of literature to established, then try to sum up his reasonable and deficiency, within hope when digging up and present the content, sum-up his contribute as well as biases, to the cause for academic thinking and approach further. |