A Study On The Refinement And Perfection Of Table Tennis

With the continuous innovation and development of table tennis’ serve technology, The receiving side, which are in the second serve in the face of table’s short ball or grab pull difficult semi ball. The Receiving method, which had transferred from a short swing control, and choose to fight, split long as assisted method to the method of Combined with screw pull and short swing control of backhand inside, a new system of receive technology. This technology’s development and apply had been protruding used by the men’s offensive game players.Under such system, the segmentation and scoring method previously adopted by the three-segment-analysis will face statistical conflict in the definition and classification of the fourth strike after sideway lift, as well as the scoring of the fourth strike after sideway lift. The widely used technique of 2nd strike sideway lift, has also made the conflict within three-segment-analysis even more prominent. The emerging of such conflict, is considered an indicator which, under the new common practices of techniques, the content of the three-segment-analysis must be enriched, its segmenting standard must be improved, its steps must be further divided, thus more precise and reliable statics will be obtained, which will further support the aftermath and the making of tranining plans.Through methods such as logical reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and comparison, the conclusion of the research is stated as follows:1. In matches of men’s attacking player types, backhand twisting play has become the primary technique to serve the ball besides drop shot. This technique has been used quite frequently, and it will become the development trend in the future of table tennis techniques. The frequent use of backhand twisting highlighted the contradiction between segmented demarcation and statistical lost points in three-section analysis method, which has become difficult to be ignored.2. In today’s table tennis technical system matches, the statistical data of the original three-section analysis method demonstrated a lot of contradictory non-corresponding segments; specifically, tactical process evaluation of defensive techniques and skills showed gaps and defects.3. The main reason for contradictions in three-section analysis method is that the original segmentation standard neglects the order of priority in the phase of stalemate in a match; moreover, two sets of segmentation standards also leads to non-corresponding and contradictory statistical data.4. On the basis of the essence of three-section analysis, segmentation standard of this analysis needs to be redefined. The tactical evaluation needs enhancement in order to provide more accurate and reliable data for today’s table tennis technical system matches, and data support for table tennis coaches and player.