| During the table tennis match, it is usually that the total score of the triumphant athlete is higher than the athlete who failed in the match, this kind of appearances reflects the ability of athlete controlling the match from the side. How to controlling the pace of match and influencing the results of match are the problems that coaches focus on for years.This article researches 100 men’s singles event from the top ranking 30 athlete in the past 4 years(2011-2014), by mainly using literature, interviewing experts, video observation and mathematical statistics, analyzed the outcome correlation between each round and the entire match, as well as during within-difference of each stage and round in the singles four-of-seven series of high level men’s table tennis athletes. The aim to explore the effect from every beginning stage, middle stage and final stage to the entire match. The conclusion of the research is as below:(1)The order of the effects from every single round to the entire match results: round 6 > round 1 > round 4 > round 2 > round 5 > round 3.(2)In the first round, when leading 5-6 scores in the mid-game period, athlete is easily volatile. the middle period and final period usually decided the results of the 1st round.(3)In the 2nd round, when leading 3-4 scores in the beginning-game period, athlete’s competition form is less stable, winning rate is lower than the score difference within 1-2.(4) The athletes’ performance in the 3rd round actually reflect their competitive form and ability level. Hence, the performance in 3rd round could be treated as the reference of the athletes ‘competitive level.(5)The 6th and 7th rounds effects the match results the most. By the analysis, during the transition period from beginning to middle of these 2 rounds, athletes need to drive the awareness of risk. It is easily to be pulled the score difference in this period and the final results will be effect eventually. |
PDF Full Text Request