Font Size: a A A

Analysis On The Technical And Tactical Characteristics Of Chinese Table Tennis Men 's Team

Posted on:2016-01-13Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J X LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2207330470464478Subject:Sports teaching
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In this study, literature review, expert interviews and other methods to determine the feasibility of the technical and tactical observation indicators. Video observation by statistical methods, for 36 games to get the video to observe statistical indicators observed raw data using Excel and SPSS19.0 software for data test and chi-square analysis of descriptive statistics,focusing on China’s men’s table tennis team’s techniques and tactics when technical characteristics, spatial characteristics and tactical characteristics were studied and analyzed. The results show that:1. the technical characteristics: the technical effect on serve, Zhang Jike, Malone,Fan Zhendong, Xu Xin, performance and stability. Zhou Yu and Yan An serve less effective; Palyers serve strategies are different, there are significant differences in the initiative to change the passive, raise awareness of the attack;on batting technique using a feature, pull and technically offensive attack there is a significant difference. Have great similarities in the use of the defense and control technology. Pull Loop technology has become an important technical and tactical use technology, and gradually to specialty technology development;athletes scoring technique and focused attack Forehand, backhand pull and attack,attack sideways and pull, twist and pull the shells hit on. Pull and backhand attack, and attack sideways pull, twist and pull the shells hit there was a significant difference in the score, there was no significant difference in the scores of other technologies. There are significant differences in the attack and losing control, losing control technology in the difference is relatively small.2. the spatial characteristics: the athletes there are significant differences in the frequency and location of the distribution of the ball to score. The percentage is greater than using backhand forehand using percentages, backhand score>forehand to score. Lost points in the batting position that does not have significant differences in frequency; tee placement athletes focused on the short ball near net positive, backhand long ball more prominent minority athletes. Ball placement on the distribution of the attack, there was a significant difference in control technology, defense technology batting placement no significant differences exist. Placement in different regions of the score and lose points.There placement area left in scoring differences, gains and losses in other regions of sub placement features have in common; athletes have significant differences in the use of batting line frequency, the larger is the frequency of use and backhand crosscourt forehand slash. Significant differences in the forehand and backhand slash slash score frequency, forehand slash, backhand crosscourt occupy the main part of the score, the backhand straight line to a minimum. In the forehand slash losing significant frequency differences.3. Tactical features: the athlete in three different stages of tactics, the highest utilization rate stalemate segment, send and receive grab grab segment segment has some differences; tactical movements related to characteristics of each technology and expertise play; three tactics in different stages, there are differences in the distribution of the various segments of the scoring rate.
Keywords/Search Tags:T able tennis, technical features, spatial features, tactical features
PDF Full Text Request
Related items