| The Qing Wu Qi's "liu chao xuan shi ding lun" is designed to "choose" Poetry Criticism of a book. Wu Qi to book and promote their Poetry. Wu Qi's three international,said the division of poetry from the macro-historical, first proposed by the Chinese Literature of ideas. Han Tao Wu Qi respected, from the genre, the spirit of the face value of three Chinese Tao described. Meanwhile, Sao Fu also be praised. The revival of Confucianism in the Qing Dynasty by Wu Qi thinking, ideas are not the main speech, to the true feelings of the large increase is also advocated. In respect "by the" respect "choose" to respect the "four sacred" purposes such as criticism, under the guidance outlines the history of poetry by Wu Qi, comments, writers, and other analytical work on the three aspects of "Selected Works" Poetry for the Comment. Wu Qi outlined Epic mainly in that the three international expositions, Wu Qi comb detail the origins of Chinese poetry, the international definition of the three is more reasonable and more thorough. Wu Qi in the Comment above, the main use of the Reflection of Life, the Meaning against, pushing the source upstream, vertical and horizontal comparison of general practice Commentary, Criticism highlight in its text oriented to moral principles supplement, The Arts Apartments Subject Comment characteristics. Meanwhile, Wu Qi's "liu chao xuan shi ding lun" to break the "Selected Works" to the original verse, content and use of such sub-division of the order of genre, time has changed to sub-volume, and then is people do for individual poems The sub-classification. Found in this style can be described as independence, "Selected Works" Criticism among the books, school of its own. More features to the number of terms Commentary Wu Qi, Wu Qi is not only being sought from the classical experience, people also learn to Comment contemporaries. His experience in order to draw the reading of Confucius "by some Royal Hiroyuki", from tan comments "Water Margin" to absorb more of the term novel critics to enrich its own Comment. Criticism of its more appropriate. |