Distinguish Errors Of "Tu More Redology"

Tu More in his book,"Tu More Redology"and"Tu More continued Redology" said, the author of A Dream of Red Mansions and The Palace of Eternal Life is the same person,Hong Sheng.The prototype of The Grand View Garden in A Dream of Red Mansions is Hangzhou Xixi.The prototype of Twelve Beauties of Jinling is Twelve Beauties of Jiaoyuan. The statement of A Dream of Red Mansions was written by Hong Sheng,the statement of Twelve Beauties of Jiaoyuan,and the statement of Xixi are the theoretical bases of "Tu More Redology". "Tu More Redology" is fundamentally deny the copyright of the Cao Xueqin's A Dream of Red Mansions,and distorted the historical facts.Methods of Tu More claimed to be "in the epistemological Materialism",but in his reasoning was used this words such as "suspected","likely ",these can not be treated as evidences.His so-called "research" not follow the principle of historical materialism, and departure from the basic principles of academic research and methods. Many "direct evidence " cited by him is deliberately distorted historical facts and absurd the solution.This article distinguish errors of Tu More's " redology system",eliminate the false and retain the true, and restore the historical truth.This article is consisting four parts. First,take researches and interpretations on the original poems of Cao Yin, Zhu Yizun, Li Tianfu, Wu Qi, Wang Zehong which were quoted by Tu More. To indicate the misunderstanding of these verses, and different degrees of distortion. To prove the error of statement that the author of A Dream of Red Mansions is Hong Sheng. The second part take a research on the differences of Twelve Beauties of Jinling in A Dream of Red Mansions and Twelve Beauties of Jiaoyuan. To prove these similar tragedies on family background, the knot Poetry Society, personality characteristics,outcomes and other aspects of Twelve Beauties of Jiaoyuan and Twelve Beauties of Jinling cannot be treated as evidences, can not serve it is the prototype of Twelve Beauties of Jinling. This just seek common not divergent "research" approach is not rigorous, unscientific. The third part quote previous odes reference to Xixi and related historical materials, to demonstrate the prototype of Grand View Garden in A Dream of Red Mansions is not Hangzhou Xixi. Tu More pointed out that Hangzhou Xixi is similarities to Grand View Garden, only from the meaning of words, the scene, to infer that is the prototype of Grand View Garden, this is lack of historical basis. Finally,this articlecompare the Similarities and differences between A Dream of Red Mansions and The Palace of Eternal Life, from the "romance" theme, the process of love and the tragic ending, the hero's character, the technique combine actual situation with fantastic, and the language style, to prove these similar tragedies,which said by Tu More, can not be used as the two works from the same person.