The Abstract Dependencies Nouns Of Modern Korean Studies

In this thesis, the purpose is to set the concept, directories, classified of abstract bound noun and discussed abstract bound noun's syntactic property and semantic property in detail. This thesis are outlined as follows:Chapter 1, the abstract bound noun's character was discussed from the concept, directory and classification three aspects. As results, the abstract bound noun's concept was set as follows:Abstract bound noun as a dependent branch does not have self-sustaining, in need of the first element modified while of its subtotal element restricted, in the sentence, the object does not have specific instructions and specific meaning.And by the concept of abstract bound noun, including 23 abstract bound nouns'directory was set.1.gyeom, 2.gim, 3. naleum, 4.nolut, 5.daelo, 6.tong, 7.tut, 8.tturam, 9.ttaemun, 10.li, 11.man, 12.mankum, 13.manchi, 14.balam, 15.ppun, 16.su, 17.yang, 18.cul, 19.cheog, 20.che, 21.tas, 22.tho, 23.thong.Chapter 2, from two aspects of precedent element and subtotal element to analyze the syntactic property of abstract bound noun in detail and elaborated. The syntactic properties of abstract bound noun can be abstracted as follows: Constraints of un-conjugation adjective, constraints of ad-nominal form ending, constraints of noun ending, constraints of"noun + ui", constraints of noun, and the constraints of postposition, predicate.Chapter 3, from domains-state, degree, limit, reason, impetus, judgment six aspects to analyze the semantic properties of abstract bound noun, and the abstract bound noun which have the similar meaning were compared. The comparative results are as follows:1)"Tong, tut, yang, cheog, che"can expressed the"similarity"meaning, but"tut, cheog, che"can only described to living things;"tong"can only used in sentence structure"-(?)/-(?)/-(?) (?)…-(?)/-(?)/-(?) (?)";"yang"has no limit when it expressed"similarity"meaning. And, both"cheog"and"che"can expressed the meaning of"pretend", but"che"can be only used in sentence with the same subject;"cheog"has no limit in this meaning.2) Both"daelo"and"mankum","manchi"can expressed the meaning of"level", but with the changes of sentient structure,"daelo"has the restriction in describing the"negative level"and"positive level"meaning,"mankum","manchi"has no restriction in this meaning.3)"Tturam"and"ppun"have no difference in"limit"meaning, but"ppun"is more free in the syntactic property than"tturam", so"ppun"is more used.4)"Ttaemun, balam, tas, thong"can expressed the"reason"meaning, but"balam, tas, thong"are often used in the sentence with the bad result,"ttaemun"has no restriction here.5) Both"gyeom"and"gim"can expressed the"impetus"meaning, but"gim"can only describe the"situation"meaning,"gyeom"often expressed the"purpose"and"the same time"meaning, so they can't replace each other.6)"Su"and"cul"can expressed"ability","method"meaning, but"cul"can only express the subjective capacity and methods,"su"often express the objective capacity and methods.In this thesis, the research core is abstract bound noun, so it may not be exhaustive in abstract bound noun's branches, so in the future, the study of abstract bound noun's branches will continue to be.