Comment On The First Domestic Forced Transaction Case Of The Beauty Salon

In the Criminal Law of97, Crime of forced transaction is charged as a specialcrime in the socialist market economy. The law provisions of Crime of forcedtransaction play a powerful role in the translation and the phenomenon of bossing themarketplace in the development of economy. Otherwise, With the development ofeconomy, all kinds of different forms of management mode are appearing. theCriminal Law of97forced trading charges of criminal law legal the circumstances ofthe crime is summarized so narrow can not cover all the forced trading behavior, legalpunishment regulations and single punishment distinctness light, make the judicialpractice of conviction hard "sin when the penalty, a penalty when its sin", greatlyweakened enforced each district law enforcement can’t unity Although the criminallaw amendment (8) add new crime sin forced trade form, using violence and threat toforce others involved in or out of bidding, auction, to force others to buy a company,enterprise or the transfer of shares, bonds and other assets, forcing others involved inor out of the business activities of specific’s code of conduct for crime. The newprovisions still can’t cover various forms of forced trading at present. So this articletreat the case of the domestic first beauty salon forced transaction as the breakthroughpoint analysis forced transaction sin and not as sin, and forced trading charges androbbery, extortion sin, the difference between the crime of fraud of the sin, etc. Andthen analyzes the components of the forced trading charges as well as our countrycriminal law on the crime of forced trading regulations inaccuracies. And improvesuggestions about perfect our country’s forced trading legislation.