The16th World Championships Of Basketball Guard Offensive And Defensive Ability Contrastive Analysis Between Chinese Team And The Top Four Teams

With the globalizations, professionalism and commercialism development in the world, it contributed to enhance the basketball sports level unceasingly. The dependence technique ability of core defenders of a team plays the decisive effect in the over all strength of game. We through the analyze of video in which the point guard attack and defend ability between China team with Halt four, providing the technical ability in the game of reference material for expand the level of China men’s basketball team, in a reason, in order to supply the scientific theoretical basis on training the excellent and completely development in each aspect.This study analyzed total36rounds of the Halt four which are the America, Turkey, Lusitanian, Serbia team and China team on16th world championship with video observation. All of these data used by Excel, Spss17.0software to draw the following conclusion:(1) In the attack on the regional, Defender mainly to limit the area of Chinese team point guard, followed by and of the restricted area between the three-point line, the least is the area outside the three-point line, mainly to insider attack and former Defender instead of four organizations, two subregions are relatively small, mainly outside the three-point line, internal and external, to outside attack.(2) The Chinese point guard playing time far more than the top four point guards. Than the top four point guards in scoring, free throw slightly more, score more than two-point shot, score less three-pointers, shooting and free throw shooting the lowest rate, there is a big gap.(3) On the scoring, the Chinese team point guard to the space shots, free throws, and high intensity defensive shots and break layup less; the top four point guards scoring more uniform and comprehensive.(4) Chinese team and the top four point guards in assists, there were significant differences in the breakthrough capacity difference is not obvious. The point guard breakthrough in the Chinese team after the ball in the top four point guards to deal with is not flexible enough, and more use of force layup made foul.(5) The fast break, the number of organized guard to participate in the fast break with the top four, there is a wide gap, there is significant difference between the fast break the number is far less than the top four, the delay on each other fast-break, the Chinese team higher success rate with the top four difference is not obvious, but the relatively large number of other unreal.(6) Point guard on the defensive side, the Chinese team and the top four in rebounding significant difference, significant difference compared to the steals and the top four; team steals there are significant differences, the point guard on the floor covers a relatively less.