Australian Stations And Tactical Analysis Of Men’s Tennis Doubles Match

In recent years, through intensive training and numerous competitions, our national male-tennis doubles’competitive level has made significant improvement. However, after several international matches, such as Davis Cup, there is still a big tactical gap if compared to many top world players. This is especially true in the service game, the lack of efficient score skills, gives the importance of this research. In this paper, through statistical summary and analysis of competition videos, using the applicant timing, success rates, score routes of Australian Stance to examine the top players’ scoring characteristics of this tactic. This can not only enrich the basic training theories of our national competitive tennis game, also it provides valuable guidance and references for improving competitiveness of national players.This research focuses on top20players in ATP and also entered the final of Grand Slam in the men’s-doubles till2010. The paper mainly uses video analysis and German SIMI SCONT analytical system to examine the application of Australian position in the12matches.Results showed:1.When the serving side wins the critical points, the times of applying Australian Stance is more compared to conventional points (p<0.05);2.There is no significant difference in applying Australian Stance when the serving side is behind in both conventional and critical points (p <0.01), when the serving side is lacking behind, the chances of applying Australian Stance is far less than when he is leading;3.When the game comes to a tie, the serving side applies the Australian Stance is20%more in the conventional points (p<0.05);4.When the serving side applies the Australian Stance, when the plays who stands in front of net moves towards the serving point, the success rates in choosing serving routes shows no obvious differences (p=0.11>0.05);5. The lowest success rates is when the serving side use Australian Stance, and as the front-net player runs to non-serving point, baseline players serves the ball to the forehead hit of service recipient (p <0.05);6. The serving side uses Australian Stance, when the front-net player of the serving side does not move, there shows little difference of the success rates in applying of three serving routes (p=0.23>0.05);7.The most successful tactical combination of serving routes and front-net’s third counterattack is front-net player attack the mid-way after the baseline player uses backhand stroke;8. When the serving side applies the Australian Stance, he should enhance the success rate of first serving, enhance the serving speed and power founded upon emphasizing serving point, and at the same time be ready for the net attack and baseline stroke;9. Also, when the serving side applies the Australian Stance, the serving player should change serving point and rhythm, increase the judging difficulty of the service recipient in his routes, which will make mild serving to get better results, and the serving point should be at the weakness of opponent. If the opponent’s capacity of forehead/backhand strokes equal, it’s better to choose backhand stroke.