| Objective:nutritional risk screening of hospitalized patients with systemicinflammatory response syndrome and the efficacy ofindividualized nutritional support,understanding of nutritional status in hospitalized patients with systemic inflammatoryresponse syndrome and the role of individualized nutrition therapy.Methods: NRS2002on197patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome of nutritional riskscreening, and body mass index, serum albumin, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts arecompared. There will be risk of malnutrition in82patients who were randomly assignedto the control group (n=43) and treatment group (n=39), within24-72h of the Hospitalrespectively for general nutritional support and individualized nutritional support.Monitoring nutritional indicators for two groups of patients and incidence ofcomplications.Results: malnutrition risk hospitalized patients with systemic inflammatoryresponse syndrome (NRS≥3) accounted for41.62%of the total investigated; Malnutritionand nutrition normal group in laboratory results the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05); Nutrition indicators and NRS2002score negatively correlated (P <0.05);Metabolic monitoring value (kcal/d) higher than that of HB equation (kcal/d) calculationresults (P <0.05);14days, the treatment group patients nutrition indicators improvedsignificantly better than control group (P <0.05), complication incidence was significantlylower than the control group. Conclusion: nearly half of the hospitalized patients withsystemic inflammatory response syndrome of the risk of malnutrition should be timelydiagnosis and treatment; NRS2002in assessment of nutritional status in patients withsystemic inflammatory response syndrome has good applicability and can be used as asystemic inflammatory response syndrome patients malnutrition screening tool; Individualized nutrition support to curative effect significantly, to nutrition indicatorsimproved obviously, effectively reduce the complications, is beneficial to the patient’srecovery. |