| Objectives: To develop two HPLC methods for the determination of fexofenadine andpantoprazole in human plasma, respectively.Methods: A high performance liquid chromatography method was developed to determine theconcentration of fexofenadine in human plasma. After a simple liquid-liquid extraction withacetyl acetate, the analyte and internal standard lorsatan were separated on a Diamonsil C18column (150 min×4.6 mm, 5μm) and detected by fluorescence detector. The detection was set atthe excitation wavelength of 230 nm and the emission wavelength of 290 nm The mobile phasewas consisted of acetonitrile-water-phosphoric acid-triethylamine (32: 68: 0.8: 0.1, v/v/v/v). Ahigh performance liquid chromatography method with UV detection was developed to determinethe concentration of pantoprazole in human plasma. After a simple liquid-liquid extraction withmixture of diethyl ether and acetyl acetate, the analyte and internal standard betamethason wereseparated on a Diamonsil C18 column (200 mm×4.6 mm, 5μm). The mobile phase was consistedof methanol-water (60: 40, v/v).The detection was set at a wavelength of 288 nm.Results: The linear calibration curve of fexofenadine was obtained in the concentration range of0.01~1.0μg·mL-1. The intra-and inter-day precision (RSD) was less than 9.6%, and the accuracywas within 100.9%. The main pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral dose of threefexofenadine hydrochloride preparations 120 mg to 18 healthy volunteers were as following:Cmax(0.50±0.23), (0.49±0.24), (0.50±0.22)μg·mL-1, Tmax(1.53±0.32), (1.50±0.30), (1.47±0.32) h,AUC0-t(3.31+1.66), (3.19±1.45), (3.36±1.71)μg·h·mL-1, AUC0-∞(3.58±1.68), (3.47±1.46), (3.63±1.71)μg·h-mL-1, t1/2(15.55±4.36), (15.64±4.73), (16.02±4.80) h, respectively. The linearcalibration curve of pantoprazole was obtained in the concentration range of 0.02~5.0μg·mL-1.The intra-and inter-day precision (RSD) was less than 8.4%, and the accuracy was within104.3%. The main pharmacokinetic parameters after a single oral dose of two pantoprazolepreparations 40 nag to 20 healthy volunteers were as following: Cmax (3.68±1.01), (3.40±1.15)μg·mL-1, Tmax (3.00±0.40), (3.00±0.46) h, AUC0-t (8.14±5.06), (8.39±5.47)μg·h·mL-1, AUC0-∞(8.29±5.09), (8.62±5.61)μg·h·mL-1, t1/2(1.61±0.28), (1.85±0.27) h. Conclusions: The two methods can be utilized for bioequivalence study of fexofenadine andpantoprazole preparations, respectively, which provide the advantage of simplicity, speed andsensitivity. |