Speech Conflict Perpective Witty Response Study

Conflict in dialogue is a common phenomenon of daily conversation, at present thestudy of speech conflict belongs to the academic hot spot, many scholars from variousaspects of the conflict in communication phenomenon investigation and discussion; Butoverall, these studies mostly describes the way and the classification of structure, only afew articles to explore psychological cognition of the communicator.Based on speech act from the film and television play, network video, networknovel, entertainment magazines and argumentation art collection in the screened111intelligently responsive dialogue as the corpus, in three respects: rhetoric, pragmatics,cognitive, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis, to explore language wittyresponse back with offensive language offend righteousness righteousness is how tocontact. We first to define witty response, think this is a speech act; Again, according tothe different methods of the intelligent response to divided into two major categories ofparody and extension, parody type according to the emphasis on form and meaning isdifferent, divided into two small yan and wide type, severe type focuses on forms ofparody, demand response and offend the words on the same and consistent in structure;Focusing on the significance of parody wide type, characteristics of words and thestructure is relaxed, but sense must correspond to the; Language and extended stressresponse of offensive language\"rework\", back words is deduced from the offensivelanguage, realize witty response; This extension can be from behavior, identity, logicrelationship from three aspects. We also from the perspective of communication strategy,witty response are studied, respondents from the semantic field of lenovo, set for theshoot, no position four Angle were made and space organization back words, think thecommunicator from play to subjective initiative, fully mobilize knowledge, experience,etc, to achieve the purpose of self-defense response.Are presented in the paper and discusses the following problems: back whengrasping the moral bottom line, the measure of the strength problem, etc; Especially inresponse to people in the organization back words should fully consider each other andtheir relations, and speculated that the real intention of the discourse, to back efforts to have a rational grasp.Are presented in the paper and discusses the following problems: back when graspingthe moral bottom line, the measure of the strength problem, etc; Especially in responseto people in the organization back words should fully consider each other and theirrelations, and speculated that the real intention of the discourse, to back efforts to have arational grasp.