Juvenile Violent Crime Intervention Aggression

Objective:Against youth violence and violent crime levels and related factors based on the investigation and study, as a guided by the cognitive method of multiple theory, behavior modification violence to establish a training plan, intervention studies to observe the intervention effects on youth violence committed aggression.Object:an investigation stage:789juvenile delinquents inmates in Shanxi Province as the research object, the intervention phase:random sample of80juvenile offenders in custody, including40as intervention group, another40people as control group.Method:a baseline survey:Using questionnaire of general information, the main scale questionnaire of the attack, influence factors scale, coping style questionnaire, the realization social support scale (PSSS) in shanxi789juvenile delinquents inmates were measured. Testing session to achieve a unified guidance language to control the interference of the external environment. And a random sample of80juvenile offenders in custody,40people as experimental group,40human intervention group, with the results of their survey pretest as experimental group and intervention group. Intervention research:On the cognitive, behavior modification multiple theory as guidance to establish a set of cognitive behavioral training plan, for members to intervention for three days, a total of6times of psychological intervention, the members of the trust, there is good environment, try to actively experience, rebuilding the rational cognition, strengthen self-awareness, to learn to control emotions, understanding social support. Intervention assessment:carried out a questionnaire after the intervention and post-test. Results:(1) Youth violence attack score in Shanxi Province was83.24+/-18.89level. The average of the attack questionnaire is72.5, it can be seen by higher overall level of violence.(2) Attack questionnaire volume table and subscales of physical aggression and verbal aggression and anger in the cultural degree there is significant difference (p<0.05); Anger subscales in father’s cultural degree, there is significant difference (p<0.05); Physical aggression subscales on his father’s average monthly income existed significant difference (p<0.05); Physical aggression, anger subscales and total attack table on mother culture level exists significant differences (p<0.05); Verbal aggression total table subscales, hostility and attacks on popular with friends level exists significant differences (p<0.05).(3) Various factors in the questionnaire of "attacking coping styles questionnaire, problem solving, self-blame, fantasy, retreat and rationalization has a significant relationship between the several factors (p<0.05), the verbal aggression and hostility in the attack questionnaire of factors and the coping styles questionnaire has significant relationship for help (p<0.05).(4) The group psychological intervention on the attack to reduce had the obvious effect (p<0.05).(5) The group psychological intervention on remorse, helping and retreat had significant effects (p<0.05).(6) The group psychological intervention on realize social support had significant effects (p<0.05).Conclusion:(1) Youth violence make use more immature, or a hybrid approach, rather than help such as mature coping styles; Lower social support of feeling; Solving problems, self-accusation, fantasy and rationalization, PSSS, influential to violent attacks. (2) Group psychological intervention training, problem solving, fantasy and rationalization of no obvious change; Remorse, for help and retreats have obvious effect. Green adult violence committed aggression and realize social support has obvious effect.