An Investigation And Analysis On Present Situation Of Commenting On Mathematics Test Papers In Junior High Schools

Curriculum reform in full swing in recent years, it is not only on the conceptuallevel, but also at the operational level.The new curriculum standards states:“The purpose of the evaluation is to fullyunderstand the students’ mathematics learning process, motivate teachers to improvestudent learning and teaching; evaluation of mathematics learning should beconcerned about both the level of student learning; better to be concerned about theiractivities in mathematics demonstrated by the emotions and attitude, to help studentsunderstand themselves and build confidence.”In this paper, it is to reflect the actual causes of the problems and analyze theseproblems and propose appropriate measures for improvement of teachers throughinterviews and questionnaires to students.Student questionnaires mainly through five dimensions to design and surveyanalysis, the paper stresses that students learn psychological observation andevaluation, analysis and comment on the paper the students’ learning gains,observation and evaluation of student papers talk about the attitude of teachers onstudent behavior intervention, aspects of classroom interaction.By analyzing the results mainly to the questions:(1)Many students are able torecognize the importance of observation and evaluation of test papers, but the papersconsidered in the analysis and comment on the study did not meet their satisfactionwith the results.(2)Some students think that did not get to improve problem-solvingability, teachers did not fully focus on "four groups" to implement, especially for basicmathematical thinking refining.(3)Students lack of independent thinking, a lot ofstudents in mathematics paper stresses teacher observation and evaluation can noteven keep up with the progress appears.(4)Too much time to explain to studentsleaving too little time to reflect and implement.(5)Less cooperation and exchangesbetween students and students, between teachers and students is also a lack ofeffective communication; Teachers use multimedia low frequencies.Conclusions:(1) the commenting is unfocused;(2) does not necessarily enhance the expansion;(3) the lack of necessary interaction;(4) Mathematics papers explaintoo casual.Made recommendations based on the analysis of teaching:(1) Paper analysisneeds to be done well, careful preparation;(2) Papers selected questions should berepresentative;(3)On the test appropriate variant expand training;(4) In the process ofcommenting on papers, to be associate review;(5) Appropriate and reasonable use ofmultimedia technology;(6) Cooperation and exchange class, lower class consolidatefeedback.