Chinese Men’s Basketball Team And Comparative Study With The Use Of Basic Positional Attack The Men’s Basketball Team Of Iran

The27th FIB A Asia Championship For Men in Philippines in2013concluded successfully. In the last Asian Championships, China won the championship, so the Chinese team attracted more attention. In this game, it was seen as a focus that Chinese team met Iranian team, which is another powerful team in Asia, and the two teams also made the loudest voices for winning the game before the match. But the Chinese team with a final51:701ost the game.In this paper, the basic cooperation during the positional attack is the main research content, and with the theory of literature consolation, statistics, video observation and other research methods, the author analyzes the performance of Chinese and Iranian teams. According to the statistics about the basic cooperation and the characters of these two teams on the offensive end, the reasons for Chinese team’s losing the game are analyzed in details. First, throughout the whole game, as for the total number of the cooperation, the Chinese team had no advantage. And because they were unable to transfer the cooperation into scoring, the rate of success is very low. Also, the forms of cooperation are very limited and the members of the team couldn’t perform well. Second, The Chinese team in positional attack used cover support more, but of poor quality. While the Iranian team not only paid more attention to break cooperation, but also got more success than Chinese team, which made Iran gain more advantage in the first half. Third, It is clear that the methods the Chinese team in the defensive end in the game are not enough. And in the offensive end it is difficult to form offensive opportunities. By contrast, Iranian team had a good state and the attack was organized well. As well, the effect of the basic cooperate is better, which made them win the game. Four, the root of the Chinese team’s losing the game is that the use of positional attack couldn’t work better than the previous levels, which led to the outside threats disconnecting. When some chances appeared, they missed them and the rate of shooting was not high. While as for Iran, the use of basic cooperation was reasonable. The rate of success was higher, which resulted in their victory.This study aims to find out the reasons for China’s big blowout losses by comparing two teams’use of basic cooperation in the attack. And it concludes that for the Chinese team, there are some problems in basic cooperation in the game, which has certain theoretical significance to summarizing the development trend of modern basketball ground offensive tactics. Also, it provides a theoretical basis for the Chinese men’s basketball team to prepare Asian championship and analyze the characteristics of the strong opponents.