The Clinical Study On The Therapy Of Linemedicine Moxibustion Which Was Combined With Electro-acupuncture, Pricking-cupping Bloodletting Method Treating Acute Herpes Zoster

ObjectiveBy randomized controlled trial, comparing with electro-acupuncture, pricking-cupping bloodletting method, the research is to stuy the clinical effects of line medicine moxibustion, electro-acupuncture and pricking-cupping bloodletting method on the treatment of Acute herpes zoster, It is also discuss the clinical curative effect of line medicine moxibustion of treatment of Acute herpes zoster, and provide objective basis for it.MethodsBy strict accordance with diagnostic criteria, inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, the research selected60patients of acute herpes zoster patients from the First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou university of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Including department of acupuncture and moxibustion and dermatological department, according to random number table method, the cases were randomly divided into two groups of30cases each. The treatment group adopted line medicine moxibustion combined with electro-acupuncture, pricking-cupping bloodletting method to treat the disease. The control group used electro-acupuncture and pricking-cupping bloodletting method to treat it. Two groups of overall treatment time of the disease is the same:once a day,10days for a course of treatment, both groups received a course, Two groups of patients before and after the treatment adopt Visual Analog Scale and, comprehensive efficacy score. We also record check blister time, scab over time, scab of time, etc, after one month, we observed the incidence of Postherpetic neuralgia in the follow-up-visits in the end, we evaluate differences of the therapeutic effect between the two methods in treatment group and control group.Results1. General dataAmong the60patients, before the treatment in the study, there were no significant difference bewteen The treatment group and The control group in age, sex, course of the disease, the pain score and the comprehensive efficacy score through statistical analysis, P>0.05.2. The improvement of HerpesDuring the course of therapy, We recorded check blister time, scab over time scab of time in the two groups, After statistics analysis, there were no significant difference of check blister time between the treatment group and the control group (P>0.05), but in the scab over time and the scab of time, two groups have significant difference (P<0.01), the treatment group was obviously shorter than the control group, The results showed that the treatment group in promoting herpes scabbing, take off a scab on the curative effect is obvious superior to the control group.3. The improvement of painIn the process of10days of treatment, we made pain intensity evaluation (VAS) score every day in the two groups, the results prove that both groups can effectively reduce nerve pain which caused by herpes zoster, After statistics analysis, Two groups have significant differences (P<0.001) in all the time (the2th day-The10th day after treatment) except for the first day. The results Prompt that the treatment group in alleviating nerve pain caused by herpes zoster on curative effect is better than the control group.4. Comprehensive efficacy score in the two groups, comprehensive efficacy score of Herpes zoster were tested every day during the process of treatment, which include local pain, itching, burning sensation, fever, local lymph node enlargement, number of blister and blister cluster, character of blister, ulcers, pimples and skin lesion area in the total score, The treatment group and control group can both effectively improve comprehensive condition of herpes and Promote healing of the skin, By statistics analysis, Two groups have significant differences (P<0.001) in all the time, the treatment group in improving comprehensive condition of herpes zoster is better than the control group. 5. The incidence of Postherpetic neuralgiaAfter one month, we observed the incidence of Postherpetic neuralgia in the follow-up visits. By statistics analysis, Two groups have significant differences (P=0.015) the incidence of Postherpetic neuralgia, The control group significantly higher than the treatment group.6. The last efficacyAt the end of the course, According to the curative standard calculation, statistics, The treatment group:Recovery:27, Excellent:3, Improvement:0, nullity:0, The tatol effective Rate:100%. The control group:Recovery:12, Excellent:16, Improvement:2, nullity:0. The tatol effective Rate:93.3%. The difference of the total effective rate of the two groupswas statistically significant(P<0.001). The efficacy of the treatment group was better than the control group.ConclusionOn the treatment of acute herpes zoster, Line medicine moxibustion combined with electro-acupuncture, pricking-cupping bloodletting method Can obtain good effect with the method of the treatment group. Both groups can effectively improve the herpes and the pain, but the treatment group curative effect is better than the control group, the study is to introduce that Line medicine moxibustion can significantly promote the herpes scabbing, scabs, relieve acute neuralgia, And can significantly reduce the comprehensive efficacy score of the herpes zoster, Effectively reduce the risk of heritage neuralgia, Can be used as one of the most effective clinical methods in treatment of acute herpes zoster.