Clinical Abdominal Therapy Clinical Observation For The Treatment Of The Cervical Spondylosis

Aim:This paper uses a small randomized controlled study method to the traditional method of acupuncture treatment for the control group. The clinical efficacy of Bo’s abdominal acupuncture for patients with cervical neck, and was designed to investigate Bo’s abdominal acupuncture treatment of cervical cervical spondylosis. The clinical efficacy and mechanism of action, and further provides for abdominal acupuncture treatment of cervical disease based on evidence-based science, exploring the role of abdominal acupuncture therapy efficacy, range, so that the future can be better in clinical use abdominal acupuncture.Methods:Eligible participants will be in a 1:1 ratio were randomly assigned to the experimental group (abdominal acupuncture group) and control group (traditional acupuncture group),35 patients in each group, provides random numbers 1-35 for the treatment group,36-70 for control group, and then observe the clinical efficacy. A total of 6 treatments, once every other day therapy, three times a week of treatment, two weeks to complete. Using internationally recognized description and measurement of pain assessed and simplify MPQ scale clinical efficacy.The result: The study subjects included 70 cases,60 cases have completed all therapy, shedding 10 cases, including five cases of treatment group off, shedding five cases in the control group, and finally included in the statistical analysis of the number of cases for the treatment group,30 patients in the control group 30 cases.1. Before treatment, the treatment group and the control group for age, sex, disease duration, MPQ scores between the two groups showed no statistical significance (P> 0.05), described the two groups were comparable baseline characteristics.2. After two courses of two groups of patients in both groups MPQ pain scores, the t test, the difference was statistically significant, P value<0.01 in the treatment group than the control group score; and specific projects with indicators ratio, the difference in pain rating index, visual analogue scale pain scores, the existing pain intensity was statistically significant, P value<0.01, suggesting that the treatment-group in improving treatment of patients with neck pain and movement disorder than the control group.3.Tips integral components of pain treatment and control groups are different in the two groups before and after treatment, and after treatment were; before and after the treatment group and the control group 3. The two ingredients to treat pain MPQ scores compared to<0.01 by t test, P value lower than before treatment, indicating that both groups can improve the treatment of neck pain and disorders and other activities.4. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two groups after the treatment group recovered in 8 cases,16 cases improved, healed six cases, the total effective rate was 80.00%; the total efficiency by rank sum test, P<0.05, statistically significance, indicating that the clinical efficacy of the treatment group than the control group.Conclusion:Based on the above results of clinical studies, the treatment groups were effective against cervical syndrome, and there are significant differences in pain rating index, visual analogue scale pain scores, and other aspects of the existing pain intensity, P value<0.01, prompt treatment group than the traditional method of acupuncture therapy in improving neck pain and obstacles. Therefore, abdominal acupuncture and physical therapy neck cervical spondylosis outstanding clinical efficacy, worthy of promotion.