| Objective This study intends to explore pelvic fractures in128layers spiral CTthree-dimensional reconstruction technique, and compared with X-ray plain film,compared128layer spiral CT scan, appraisal128layer spiral CT three-dimensionalreconstruction technique in the clinical application value of pelvic fractures.Methods In this paper, the49exception wound patients with pelvic fractures, X-rayplain film in examination,128layer spiral CT scan and128spiral CT three-dimensionalreconstruction, on the basis of secondary review or clinical surgery. The results werestatistically analyzed. Comparing the three in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures and misseddiagnosis.Result On the basis of secondary review or clinical surgery,49cases of suspiciouspatients with pelvic fractures, fracture were found120. Confirmed101ordinary X-rayplain film group, misdiagnosis and16,5from the suspicious ordinary X-ray plain filmgroup of pelvic fractures diagnosis rate was84.17%(101/120), including5from thesacrum fracture for missing three. The stereo configuration of the3d reconstruction haveshown good, fracture observation. Relationship with the adjacent bone. Two-dimensionalCT scan image diagnosis of113, including96fractures and14joint separation ordislocation, the accuracy of diagnosis was94.17%(113/120).3d reconstruction groupadded image diagnosis of tiny fractures,7diagnostic accuracy was100%(120/120). MPR,MIP and VR, respectively,119,117and119found that fracture, fracture diagnosis rate was99.17%(119/120),97.50%(117/120) and96.67%(116/120).Conclusion1.128layers spiral CT3d reconstruction technology has obviousadvantages in diagnosis of pelvic fractures, is an effective method for diagnosis of pelvicfractures.2.128layers spiral CT three post-processing reconstruction technique (MPR MIP VR) in the diagnosis of pelvic fractures in complement each other, can improve thediagnostic rate of higher. |