The Exegetical Studies Of Annotations In The Classical Chinese Of＜YU WEN＞

Yu Wen are Chinese textbooks which had passed by the national middle and primaryschools’ textbooks authorization committee in2002.They have been the teaching andlearning authoritative textbooks of Chinese course during3years that from Grade7toGrade9.A lot of educational circles’ predecessors and academic circles’ experts andscholars have paid great efforts for the publishing and performing of the standardexperimental textbooks. The part of classical Chinese in the textbooks has been the keypoints and difficulties during the teaching and studying. The annotations of classicalChinese should be studied in the process of teaching. Therefore, it has been a problemthat every annotations of every classical Chinese in the textbooks right and scientific ornot, which is worthy of attention and consideration by every teachers and students thathave been using the textbooks.The classical Chinese annotations in the textbooks will be used as the raw materials andresearch objects. This paper will use three methods, including classification, data statistics,inducing and deducing, which will be used for realizing the scientific and systematic ofthe annotations.There are3parts in this article.The Exordium is the first part. It will beused for introducing to the subject’s research objects, targets, tasks, the achievementsand drawbacks, and research methods. And the second part is specific study which is thecontent of exegetical studies of classical Chinese annotations in the textbooks.According to the ancient and modern Chinese linguistic theories and actual situations ofthe raw materials, all the classical Chinese annotations will be divided to12classes inthis part. They are just12chapters in this paper. They will be used to study respectivelythe annotations and obtain accurate conclusions. There are12chapters in this part,whichincluding: The Summary Of Classical Chinese Annotations’ Situations Chapter; TheClassical Chinese Titles’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical Chinese InterchangeableCharacters’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical Chinese Function Words’ AnnotationsChapter; The Classical Chinese Monosyllabic Notional Words’ Annotations Chapter;The Classical Chinese Disyllables’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical ChineseAdverbs’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical Chinese Phrases’ Annotations Chapter;The Classical Chinese Sentences’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical ChineseGrammars’ Annotations Chapter; The Classical Chinese Supplements’ AnnotationsChapter; Finally, it is the conclusions part of this paper.The right is2694.The wrong is320.In the other words,the correct rat is about89.38%,but the wrong rat is about10.62% in the all studied3014annotations. In the future of the work, it is hopethat,firstly,increasing numbers of experts would have chances to participate in this workand contribute to their wisdom and power together for this work.Meanwhile,it is hopethat they could study and summarize the every reasons of making mistakes.Secondly,itis hope that basing on the annotations of the Grand Chinese Dictionary to do this workstrictly.Only in this way,can every annotations be more perfect and scientific thanbefore.