| As the theory of modern Western society," aestheticization of daily life " hasn’t been going so smoothly in China.There are two different situations:Professor Tao Dongfeng represents the pro and Lu Shuyuan and Zhao Yong represent the other side. From a macro perspective, theorists have three following clues to the " aesthetics of daily life ".One for the " aesthetics of daily life," the legitimacy that is, the products of modern Western consumer society on most levels can explain China’s social reality. Secondly for the pros and cons of aesthetics of daily life ", Chinese theorists focus on consumer culture theory behind the reaction.Thirdly, daily life aesthetic impact on literature and literary theory boundary generated.Compared to the previous two clues, clues to discuss this more focused on the theoretical context of the internal. Although China’s entering the consumer society or not is a worthy research question, but it is undeniable that Chinese society has been characterized by the consumer society. Whether aesthetic escaped traditional areas of literature and art which shines into the public’s daily life? If aesthetic goes into the daily life of the masses, is it on behalf of the public aesthetic subject? In the Chinese context how shall we treat the Aestheticization problem? Therefore, the study of this paper is based on two premises. First, after considering " aesthetics of daily life " in the context of contemporary Chinese,this issue, these theories and practice of China’s specific criticisms are fit or not. Second, examining the aesthetics of daily life, you need to be vigilant against this theory’s exaggeration. The limit is a necessary prerequisite to ensure the effectiveness of the theory. This article is on the basis of "Chinese aesthetics of daily life " theoretical research.Based on the above premise, we will discuss the subject of daily life aesthetic issues, aesthetic and cultural issues, and disciplining its identity relationship in depth. |
PDF Full Text Request