| Since philosophy has become a subject to be studied, it is constantly required as a rigorous science to satisfy the highest demand of theory of by itself, also, to provide the all sorts of existing science with the foundation of apodictic evidence. The demand of apodictic represents the philosophy’s constantly pursuit for pure absolute knowledge. However, Husserl realized that philosophy would never develop into a rigorous science in any time. Dating back to the old philosophic system, he thought the history object of philosophy cannot be seen as the even most rigorous science, aiming to regarded as an achievable presuppose. Therefore, Husserl has been donating himself in constructing the phenomenology into to philosophy without any presuppose and premise.Based on this idea, Husserl’s phenomenology appears as a feature of: it refuses the simple believe of natural attitude coming from outer world, by contrast, it is always surprised by the simple facts that people get used to, and understands and inspects them by the usual way. But, “seek to accommodate itself to" does not mean the things will appears in a mix order without meanings in phenomenology, and does not mean specially the things are only objectives from outer world. In his eyes, Husserl thought there was an important amaze, which had been focused and pursuit during his whole career of studying on phenomenology. That is about pure ego and consciousness, per se.In Husserl opinion, finding the foundation of the object world beyond the consciousness will caused the arrogation on the traditional metaphysics. Therefore, the direction must turn back to “egoâ€. During the period of turning, Husserl noticed Descartes. It was Descartes opening up the converting to subject itself in temporary philosophy. Based on this meaning, Husserl regarded Descartes as the real beginner, and described Descartes’ “cogito†as the introspective paragon in philosophy, and called his phenomenology “New Descartesâ€. Comparing with the Descates’ “Cogito†concept, Husserl revealed the limitations in his philosophy, and transformed them extremely. After restoring the “Cogitoâ€, he achieved the pure consciousness area along with the ego inside it, that is the “transcendental egoâ€.All the philosophers who hold subjectivity ideas have to face up to respond the interrogation of solipsism, Husserl’s concept of "transcendental ego" is also facing the plight of solipsism. Because the suspending of world beingness means the extremely suspending of other “-ismsâ€. For Husserl, it is a important puzzle that how, as the base of transcendental consciousness, “transcendental egoâ€, can overpass the “Iâ€, to become the “Weâ€ã€‚So, Husserl began to try to entitle the Leibniz’sâ€monad†features on “transcendental egoâ€, and found the “left world â€back.By the efforts, Huseerl tried to build up his intersubjectivity theory, offering an opportunities for dealing with the difficulties that "transcendental ego" surpasses “solipsism. |