The Comparative Study Of Family Foster Care And Organization Care Of Orphans And Disabled Children

Orphans and disabled children of parenting is an important part of the child-welfare. At present children’s raising mode of our country mainly divided into the organization care and family foster care. By the end of2010,25200orphans got the child-welfare card in the country. All kinds of social welfare institution adopted100000children. Social welfare homes had a total of50000beds nationwide. There is a big difficulty, if relying solely on welfare institutions to solve the upbringing of orphans and disabled children, resettlement problems. So the government and the child welfare institution should actively promote the family foster care in the development of orphans and disabled children welfare. However, the government and the child welfare institutionadvocate vigorously the welfare socialization of form, at the same time we should see the limitations at the family foster care.The dissertation based on the theory of socialization, theories of human rights, social equity theory, and family structure function role and parent’s liability theory. And using literature study, comparative study, field study methods to researching, then combining with parts of the subject research data of the Nanjing Social Welfare Home. According to look up relevant theory. Reference to upbringing of orphans and disabled childrenrelated theory, and explore the service nature of the orphans and disabled children parenting modes. Through research relevant literatures to the upbringing of the orphans and disabled children in Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, Japan, and comparison for the mainland china and developed countries and regions in the family foster care development experience. Combined with field observations of the Social welfare home for children in Nanjing, the comparison of the characteristics of urban families’foster care and rural families foster care in domestic several places. We further study in the development status of the orphans and disabled children upbringing in institutional care and family foster care two rearing modes, comparative analysis of the pros and cons of the two rearing styles.Foreign and Hong Kong area family foster care services development are more mature. The development of the child welfare services gradually forms a professional service system. In which, family foster care and institutional care is complementary the orphans and disabled children parenting style. At present our country government strongly advocated family foster care. Child welfare agencies actively promote the foster family care. However, the understanding of the family foster care is not enough. The government and the agencies exaggerated propaganda of the advantages which the family foster care has, and blind to the family foster care. This phenomenon is a direct result of the low professional level of the family foster care and no effect. The family foster care did not achieve practical results.Welfare agencies blindly praise highly the family foster care for the Orphans and disabled children in resettlement and neglect the development of the organization care.Two ways of resettlement does not make a clear functional distinction. Chaotic operation of the family foster care is easy to make the foster parents disappointment and resistance. And let the foster children growth produce adverse effect. To the degrees of disability lighter children, after surgery or drug therapy, the body gradually restored, the family foster care is more conducive to children’s physical mental growth. To more serious degree disability for children, the institution may be the best way to make them have the best living environment to rehabilitation care, because the institution has professional rehabilitation. For the upbringing of orphans and disabled children should be introduced to the social force of social organizations and professional social workers to intervene to assess the needs and characteristics of the orphans and disabled children, Then we should make the distinction and choice scientific in resettlement way. Which to a certain extent it would reduce welfare agencies of pressure. Multiple forces involved in the upbringing of orphans and disabled children to play a positive role in promoting, more conducive to the healthy growth of orphans and disabled children.