The 27th Asia China Team’s Offensive Tactics Used Comparative Analysis

In the 27 th Asian championship basketball game, the Chinese team in the final result is the fifth place, before the current Asian championship, the Chinese team is also the third worst performance. Fifth grade is in the Chinese team to participate in the Asian championship for 38 years, for the first time in the quarter-final defeat to any country, is also the first time lost to Chinese Taipei(18 points) by a large margin. The 2014 World Cup in Spain basketball promotion opportunities for the directly on the four door lost the best opportunity. At the same time, the Chinese team in the history of the Asian men’s basketball top three good grades this year due to a bad result of reduced to five.Never lose the opponents and worst record history, prompted this study based on the China and South Korea, Iran, and defeat Chinese Taipei’s offensive tactics applying problems, as well as the gap between rival, by the methods of literature material, expert interview method, video observation and statistics analysis were analyzed. Mainly in China, South Korea, Iran, Chinese Taipei team 4 basic situation; The Chinese team with 3 team statistic; Attack attack frequency and time; Shooting way and shooting; Rebounding technology; Main players attack technology and fast break and positional attacks the seven aspects of statistical analysis, to find the lost tactics. At the same time, draw lessons from and absorbing opponent in the race for China’s situation, the use of offensive tactics and strategies and methods.The results show that:Both personal technical index analysis and contrastive analysis of the overall tactical, the Chinese team in the competition of the state, in offensive tactics, individuals in field goal percentage and free throws on the success rate of there are serious problems, significantly lower than the opponent’s play, only rely on the offensive rebounding Numbers cannot ever, scoring the effect is not high, especially in China after losing inside advantage, perimeter points can’t play a proper level, makes the game in a relatively passive situation, a game, again good defender, but low offensive means single and the effect of the attack, is bound to lose control of the game, which leads to the loss of the game.In attack technology contrast, from the point of view of the number of shots and scoring method and other three teams there is a certain gap, eventually lead to disadvantage to score with the players in the face of different opponents in unbalance, led to the shooting percentage than the other three players shooting on the low side, therefore, lost the ability to compete in the score; Again from the perspective of the offensive and defensive end, the Chinese team lost the game the original strong advantage inside, attack power, has been constantly differentiation in China in the fast break, positional attack a serious problem.In addition from the tactical utilization, because the players and coaches to the opponent’s estimated obviously lightly, makes the process of game, too confident, appeared to be super points, still continue to use the original tactics, obviously not suitable for the game process of change, the details of the game, the player’s psychological obvious changes have taken place, in both offense and defense are appeared problems, should not be so led to the defeat of the game.