| The mercury pollution in atmospheric environment is a global problem that has caused widespread concern in the world.Coal-fired power plants are major anthropogenic sources of mercury emissions.Mercury in coal is released in three forms: elemental(Hg0),oxidized(Hg2+)and particulate-bound(Hgp).Compared with Hg2+ and Hgp,Hg0 is very difficult to remove from the flue gas due to its high volatility and low solubility in water.In recent decades,many countries,especially in the developed countries,have taken steps to reduce mercury uses and releases.Recently,the technology for Hg0 catalytic oxidation by using the catalyst and O2 to oxidized mercury which can be desorbed with pyrolysis and collected for reutilization has broad application prospects.However,the Hg0 removal efficiency was strongly dependent on many factors,such as preparation method and the presence of SO2.In this thesis,the opposite Hg removal performance of how can SO2 promote the catalytic oxidation of Hg0 over CeOx–TiO2 and inhibit over MnOx–TiO2 catalyst was carried out in detail,and the SO2 poisoning mechanism analysis was analyzed.The physicochemical properties of the catalysts were characterized by BET,XRD,FTIR,Raman,H2-TPR,TG-DSC,and XPS techniques.The reaction path of SO2 over the two catalysts was studied.The various influence factors and inherent correlation of promotion and inhibition caused by SO2 were explored.Furthermore,to prove the mechanism of promotion and inhibition over the two catalysts in the process of Hg0 capture,the composition of sediment on the catalyst surface,the evolution and coordination environment of the main elements were also investigated.Moreover,to improve the distribution of surface groups and activity center and obtain higher sulfur poisoning resistance,the modified Mn metal oxide catalyst was prepared by doping transition metal Ru.Through the above research,the important theoretical and scientific basis for in-depth understanding the mechanism of SO2 poisoning and the important conclusions are summarized as follows:(1)The adsorbent prepared by the sol–gel method showed higher Hg0 removal efficiency,which may be owed to the difference of the content and state of MnOx caused by preparation methods.(2)When the SO2 was injected,the Hg0 removal efficiency over MnOx–TiO2 adsorbents decreased dramatically,which can be illustrated that SO2 can react with manganese oxide to produce their sulfate compounds on the surface of adsorbents.The addition of Ru into MnOx-TiO2 adsorbent can not only increase the activity of Hg0 removal,but also enhance its SO2 resistance performance,because the existence of Ru in RMT would preferentially attract SO2 to produce Ru sulfate and protect the adjacent MnOx.(3)For CeOx–TiO2 adsorbents,the results indicated that in the initial reaction period,the Hg0 removal efficiency significantly increased with the presence of SO2 because of the reaction between CeTi and SO2.With the reaction time increasing,the promotional effect of SO2 on Hg0 removal over CeTi adsorbent gradually decreased due to the presence of large amount of cerium sulfate species. |