| Objective:To observe and discuss the clinical efficacy of the treatment of accupucturing the meridian tendon on the upper extremity during the ischemic stroke acute phase clinical observation on upper extremity function, looking for much more better therapeutic schedules to treat the ischemic stroke upper extremity dysfunction.Once a day,14 days altogether. Comparison the difference between the 2 groups before and after the treatment of FMA, ARTR, MBI, MAS, ROM scores, the objective of the conclusion, the final judgment in accordance with the efficacy of treatment options.Methods:Collected 60 patients in the ischemic stroke acute phase, with upper extremity dysfunction, and met the inclusion criteria.By random assignment, they were divided into treatment group and control group with 30 cases in each group. According to Jingjin theory, the treatment group used the treatment of accupucturing the meridian tendon on upper extremity, the control group used the conventional acupuncture method.Results:1.60 groups of cases, a total of 60 groups were completed. The structural components of the treatment group and the control group were statistically significant (P>0.05), such as age, sex, stroke type, and so on.2. Before and after treatment, through the experimental group and control group of upper limb FMA and MBI, MAS, ROM table score, activity of elbow score differences, tests and obtained the after treatment in the index treatment has a significant difference (P< 0.05) and treatment group and control group after treatment score difference with significantly (P< 0.05). 3. Before and after treatment, by comparing the treatment group and control group differences in the amount of ARAT scores, tests and obtained after treatment between the two groups was the index treatment has a significant difference (P< 0.05), but the treatment group, control group treatment compared to no significant difference (P> 0.05).4. After the treatment, the two groups of nerve function defect score comparison, the effective rate of treatment group reached 93%, control group, the effective rate was 83%, after inspection, got the differences was significant (P< 0.05) and was statistically significant, the effect of experimental group was better than that of the control group.Conclusion:1.Treatment group and control group can improve the upper limb motor function and nerve function in acute phase of ischemic stroke, and the effect of treatment group is better than that of control group;2.Treatment group and control group on the recovery of hand motor function in acute phase of ischemic stroke is not obvious;3.Treatment group and control group can effectively improve the muscle tension of flaccid paralysis of muscles, treatment group muscle tension inhibit muscle spasm in a certain extent. |