| ObjectiveObjective to research and analyze the current status of organizational justice and influence factors related to the organizational justice score,to understand the work and survival status of the CDC staff in the province.Methods1.Investigation objectUsing stratified random sampling method,according to the Liaoning provincial and municipal levels of economic development in the economically developed,more developed and underdeveloped three areas were randomly selected from 1 cities and 1 counties,each city selected 1 city level and 2 district level CDC,1 county level CDC and several township protection stations are extracted from each county(The township control stations under the jurisdiction of the county were more than 10,and 10 were extracted,less than 10 of the total survey).A total of 684 people.2.Investigation contentA cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on all the surveyed subjects.The questionnaire included general demographic information and organization of fairness scales.Self-compiled general demographic questionnaire: Including age,gender,department,job title,education,seniority,marital status,job title,job satisfaction and turnover intention.An improved organizational fairness table was used in the organizational fairness scale.There are four dimensions in the scale: fair distribution,fair procedure,fair leadership and fair information,totaling 22 questions.Using Likert’s five-point rating,1 is strongly agreed,2 is more agreed,3 is not clear,4 is disagreed,5 is strongly disagreed,the higher the score,the worse the staff’s sense of fairness and the more unfair the feel of the organization.3.Statistical methodsUsing Epi Info 6.0 double entry to establish a database,using SPSS 17.0 statistical software,according to the type of data,Z-test,ANOVA and multivariate linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis,the significant test level α = 0.05.Results1.The disease control personnel have a poor sense of fairness in distribution,and a better sense of procedural fairness,a better sense of fairness in leadership and a better sense of information fairness.2.Comparison between different regions,municipal organizations below the county fair organizational justice,the total score and each dimension had significant difference(p<0.05);Comparing the level of CDC,the sense of organization above CDC in city and district is higher than that in municipal CDC.The level of organization fairness of district CDC is higher than that of municipal CDC.There is significant difference between the total score and each dimension(P<0.05).3.The perceived organizational willingness and job satisfaction were significantly and positively correlated with the correlation coefficient of 0.139 ~ 0.779(P<0.05),mean the worse the organizational sense of fairness,the worse the job satisfaction of employees,the easier it is to quit.4.There are 12 factors that affect the fairness scores of organizations,including chronic diseases,sex,working years,education background,personnel nature,job title,position,unit level,marital status,income level and health status.Conclusion1.CDC staff assigned a lower sense of fairness.2.The sense of organizational justice and turnover intention,job satisfaction were significantly correlated.3.The positive factors of organizational justice include CDC level,marital status,income level and health level.The negative factors are geographical,gender,working life,academic qualifications,personnel nature,professional title,and chronic illness or not. |