Font Size: a A A

A Comparative Analysis Of The Technical Characteristics Of The Badminton Men's Singles Player Xiaolong And The World's Best Badminton Players

Posted on:2018-05-15Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:L RaoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2357330518451723Subject:Physical Education and Training
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
This paper mainly through the literature material law,video analysis,mathematical statistics,comparative analysis on athletes Chenlong and Lin Dan,lee,J-jorgensen,accel's 25 games in the technical application situation through data analysis,to study the athletes Chenlong in the actual usage,performance and technology find Chenlong on the pros and cons of the game,and according to the data presented by the situation to make corresponding advice,in order to athletes Chenlong training is helpful in the future,and provide reference for other athletes in training.Through to the Chenlong and the four players score,points to make detailed analysis and comparison,summed up the Chenlong in the match with the four athletes present scores,runs regular features and found that the Chenlong in the advantages and disadvantages and concrete has the following several aspects:1.The driving mode and regional aspect,Chenlong mainly backhand short hair,long ball is complementary,front zone 1 and 2 is more,the back area is less,no,3 and 4 and no.1 and no.2 area,unbalanced regional distribution of no.3 and 4.The remaining four athletes to serve in the region of the no.1 and no.2,the back 3 and 4 regional distribution is more homogeneous.2.In receiving technology,the athlete Chenlong various technique using unbalanced,front tend to use to pick the ball technology,net control consciousness is not strong,the back to kill the ball did not give full play to technology,the increased use of receiver to kill the ball technology.3.In the frontcourt technology aspect,Chenlong and four athletes technical front area utilization rate is higher than the back,midfield area.Front area as important in the badminton match against location,Chenlong mainly on the ball,chop as the main scoring technique,selects the ball technology rate is highest,Chenlong in the front area technology play an unstable,points rate is higher.4.Chenlong all technology using the least number in midfield,mainly for blocking the ball,take the ball,the ball,to kill the ball as midfielder main scoring technique,the highest rate allowed to block the ball technology.Chen's technique in midfield is generally not so different from the other four players.In scoring,asselson was significantly higher than Chen long,scoring a goal,and having a certain distance from li zongwei,which was higher than j-jorgenson.5.Chenlong of various technologies in the backcourt,kill the ball technology as the main attack way,and lob technology utilization rate is almost flat.Scores on a Chenlong lob technology more than Lin Dan and lee,less than J-jorgensen,accel,smash technology and score more than J-jorgensen,accel,less than Lin Dan and lee.The loss situation,the murder of Chenlong ball,lob points with four athletes have no obvious difference.Chenlong backcourt serves the highest,the technology has the advantages of the back area.
Keywords/Search Tags:badminton, Chen long, Men's singles, Comparative analysis of tactics
PDF Full Text Request
Related items