The Influence Of Network Public Opinion On The Management Of Smog And Its Path Analysis

For a long time,the local government’s smog governance mainly relied on superior orders,and this top-down political behavior obviously sacrificed public participation;with the level of economic development and the education level of residents,information(especially network information)Increased accessibility,public awareness of environmental issues and enthusiasm for participation are gradually increasing,and the news media’s continuous escalation of environmental damage disclosure has inevitably brought enormous real pressure on the government and sewage companies,and Gradually derived the theory of "controversy of public opinion",then,in the case of local governments blindly pursuing economic growth and lacking the power to solve the problem of smog pollution autonomously,whether it is possible to solve the urban smog governance dilemma through some bottom-up approach.worthy of study.Based on the above observations and reflections,this paper uses the five new media platforms to obtain public opinion information about smog and air pollution in various cities in 2009-2017,and builds a network paradox that characterizes public attention based on the hierarchical dynamic factor model.The index focuses on the use of spatial econometric analysis tools.Under the conditions of investigating the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of smog pollution and the spatial spillover effects,the influence of network paradox on haze and its path of action are analyzed.Based on theoretical analysis,the article puts forward the research hypothesis of this paper in the third part,which are as follows:(1)The “paradox” effect produced by the network paradox helps to promote the problem of haze control and thus achieve the effect of improving air quality;2)Government environmental regulation is an intermediary mechanism for network public opinion to alleviate smog.Among them,the policy effect of regulatory tools and economic tools is the most obvious,while information tools have little effect.In the empirical part,the article first validates the above hypothesis based on the spatial panel Dubin model(SDM).The results show that:(1)China’s smog pollution presents an obvious "high pollution club" agglomeration feature,while also having a significant positive Spillover effect-a 1% increase in PM2.5 concentration in the adjacent region will result in a 0.59% increase in local PM2.5 concentration;(2)an increase in network paradox will not only help mitigate local smog pollution,but also help reduce neighbors.PM2.5 concentration,and the change of the adjacent PM2.5 caused by this factor is similar to the local PM2.5 variation ratio of 1:0.87;(3)when a city(region)smog regulatory regulation When administrative regulation and economic regulation reach the average intensity of sample cities,the impact of network public opinion on PM2.5 is significant-0.730,-0.719,-0.710,respectively,that is,network public opinion will achieve smog governance through the above three regulatory behaviors.However,the mediating role of information tools is not obvious.Secondly,the article examines the spatial and temporal differentiation of the above research based on the space-time geographic weighted local regression model(GTWR).When the haze broke out,the influence of network public opinion on PM2.5 in 92 sample cities showed a "two-pole positive effect,intermediate negative effect" distribution system on the map,that is,there was no significant influence in the northeast and southwest regions,and the suppression effect was the strongest.The cities are concentrated in North China and East China,and are mainly composed of members of the “High Pollution Club”.In the government regulation,environmental information regulation is more conducive to the mitigation of smog in the northeast region.The economic regulation tools have obvious smog reduction effects in the southwest and Guanzhong areas,and the regulatory tools are more suitable for all regions except the northeast region.Strong smog suppression effect,and administrative control has the most obvious effect on PM2.5 high value area.Finally,based on the triple difference model(DDD),the article examines the regulatory effects of public opinion on different government governance behaviors and draws the following conclusions:(1)In the long run,long-term policies are not effective in mitigating smog;in the short-term,long-term environmental policies are more conducive to exerting policy effects and improving urban air than short-term policies,which are temporary government-focused behaviors.Quality;(2)China’s high-wind areas such as Changchun,Jilin,Siping,Shenyang,Qinhuangdao,Anshan and other cities may have the habit of “depending on the sky”.