| Objective to explore the value of radiomics predictive model based on preoperative enhanced MR images in preoperative grading of glioma and in the prediction of IDH1 genotype in high-level glioma.Methods Retrospective analysis of 425 patients(154 cases of WHO Ⅱ grade,128 cases of WHO ⅡI grade,143 cases of WHO Ⅳ grade)with glioma confirmed by surgical pathology from December 2012 to January 2018 in the affiliated hospital of Qingdao university with complete preoperative brain-enhanced MR images,randomly divided into training group and verification group according to the ratio of 7:3.And 182 high-grade gliomas patients undergoing immunohistochemical analysis were selected,including 79 cases of IDH1 mutation(45 cases of WHO Ⅲ grade,34 cases of WHO Ⅳ grade),103 cases of IDH1 wild type(33 cases of WHO Ⅲ grade,70 cases of WHO Ⅳ grade),randomly divided into the primary dataset and validation dataset according to the ratio of 7:3.Lasso-Logistic regression analysis and Random Forest was used to construct the glioma diagnostic grading model and high-grade glioma IDH1 mutant prediction model and the two models was tested with cross-validation method.The area under ROC curve(AUC)was used to evaluate the efficacy of the two models.Results The glioma diagnostic grading modelhad a good diagnostic performance in both training setand validation set.The glioma diagnostic grading modelaccurately diagnosed grade II gliomas in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the training set was 0.92 with 95% confidence interval(CI): 0.89-0.95,and the sensitivity and specificity were 90.7% and 74.6%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.685 and 0.930.The glioma diagnostic gradingmodel accurately diagnosed grade II gliomas in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the validation set was 0.84(95% CI: 0.77-0.91),the sensitivity and specificity were 89.1% and 69.3%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.640 and 0.912.The glioma diagnostic grading model accurately diagnosed grade Ⅲ gliomas in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the training set was 0.88(95% CI: 0.84-0.92),the sensitivity and specificity were 45.6% and 96.6%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.837 and 0.822.The glioma diagnostic grading model accurately diagnosed grade Ⅲ gliomas in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the validation set was 0.58(95% CI: 0.47-0.70),the sensitivity and specificity were 24.4% and 87.5%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.421 and 0.755.T The glioma diagnostic grading model accurately diagnosed grade Ⅳ gliomas in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the training set was 0.90(95% CI: 0.86-0.94),the sensitivity and specificity were 77.6% and 87.7%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.768 and 0.882.The glioma diagnostic grading modelaccurately diagnosed grade Ⅳ glioma in grade II-IV gliomas with an AUC value in the validation set was was 0.80(95% CI: 0.71-0.89),the sensitivity and specificity were 61.9% and 84.8%,and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.684 and 0.807.The accuracy of the glioma diagnostic grading model in predicting predictive power in the training group was 0.74(95% CI: 0.68-0.79),and the accuracy in the validation group was 0.62 95%CI: 0.53-0.71).The high-grade glioma IDH1 mutant prediction model showed good discrimination for predicting high-grade glioma IDH1 mutants in both training set and validation set.The AUC in the training group was 0.87,with a 95% CI of 0.754 to 0.855,an accuracy of 0.798,and a sensitivity of 85.5% and specificity of 75.4%,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.734、0.867.The AUC in the validation set was 0.86,with a 95% CI of 0.690-0.913,an accuracy of 0.789,and a sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 69.0%,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.700 and 0.909.Conclusion The glioma diagnostic grading model based on preoperative enhanced MR images has a good predictive power for identifying different grades of gliomas.The classification model is the best at identifying grade Ⅱ gliomas,the second effective in the identification of grade Ⅳ gliomas,and the least effective in identifying grade Ⅲ gliomas.The high-grade glioma IDH1 mutant prediction model based on preoperative enhanced MR can effectively predict the IDH1 genotype preoperatively in high-grade glioma before operation. |