| Objective:To investigate the effect of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS)on cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction(HFPEF).Method:The target is the HFPEF patient who was admitted to the Department of Cardiology,a 3 A grade hospital from October 2016 to September 2018,A total of 68cases of OSAHS diagnosed by polysomnography,worked as a group with HFPEF and OSAHS;at the same time,patients with no OSAHS matched with age,gender,and accompanying disease were used as a control group(n=68).Baseline data of enrolled patients includes age,gender,concomitant disease,body mass index(BMI),smoking history,New York Heart Association(NYHA)cardiac function grading.Sleep breathing was monitored and the following information was recorded:apnea hypopnea index(AHI),mean pulse oxygen saturation(MSaO2),and lowest pulse oxygen saturation(LSaO2);the serum NT-proBNP level and 6MWT results should be assayed.The M-mode two-dimensional echocardiography was recorded as follows:LVIDD,LA,IVST,LVPWT,EDV and ESV.Calculate LVEF,and Doppler Ultrasound Measurements including E peak,A peak,E/A,E/e’.The measurement data were expressed by(`x±s),and the t-test was used to compare between groups;the count data was expressed by the composition ratio or rate,and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups.The difference was statistically significant at the test level P<0.05.Result:Baseline data comparison::there were no statistical differences in gender,age,smoking history,NYHA cardiac function grading,and accompanying disease between the two groups(P>0.05),and BMI was statistically different(P<0.05);Comparison of sleep respiration monitoring indicators:AHI,MSaO2,LSaO2 were significantly different between the two groups(P<0.05);Comparison of cardiac structure:there was significant difference in IVST,LVPWT and LA between groups(P<0.05);Comparison of left ventricular diastolic function:LVIDD,EDA,E/e’,E/A were statistically different between groups(P<0.05);Comparison of cardiac function indicators:there was no significant difference in NT-proBNP between the groups(P>0.05),and the 6MWT distance was statistically different(P<0.05).Conclusion1.Compared with the control group,the left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement of HFPEF combined with OSAHS group were more distinct;2.Patients with HFPEF combined with OSAHS have more severe left ventricular diastolic dysfunction than patients with HFPEF alone;3.OSAHS aggravates cardiac dysfunction in patients with HFPEF and reduces exercise tolerance;4.Obesity is a risk factor for OSAHS;5.HFPEF patients often combine multiple diseases at the same time.Coronary heart disease and hypertension are the most common primary diseases. |